Olive
Explorer
Nightfall said:Olive, was that in Dragon 315 or 314?
Neither: Dragon #212.
I agree with Shard that we don't need endless new core classes for different specialisations, but these seemed kinda interesting.
Nightfall said:Olive, was that in Dragon 315 or 314?
Epametheus said:Wait a minute, two schools? *looks up the SRD*
Blech. What idiot decided that all of the schools were actually balanced with each other, and that all of them were actually good enough to be worth sacrificing two schools for?
Scrap being a specialist; Necromancer isn't worth it, at all.
However, we are talking high-level, death-obsessed wizard here. Go ahead and make the guy a Lich; I think that should more than work as his "prestige class"![]()
Nightfall said:Maybe so but I guess I'm still a little irate at the fact that while they DO have a more rigid spell list, they have a lot of powers most wizards don't have, nor clerics. They might be weaker in some respects, but in some ways they outclass normal core classes.
Monks don't scare me but I certainly DON'T like using them.
Olive, doh! I forgot about that.But regarding you last question, they were fine. But I wish SOMEONE would do one that specializes in arcane uses of negative energy. Would I use them? Maybe. But I doubtful.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.