Raloc said:
Use of the word "hackers" as a derogatory term applied to those people that go around compromising systems and destroying data/stealing etc. is generally frowned upon by those people that originally coined the term, which referred basically to programmers and hobbyists that modified hardware/software for their own purposes.
"Crackers" would be the term to use when referring to those people that solely compromise systems/destroy data/steal whatever. The use of "hacker" to describe these people is a bit of a misnomer left over from the days when kids were being busted for breaking into telco switching stations and the like. The actions of said users were demonized and the term "hackers" was used to describe anyone that fits the description of a "cracker" rather. So, old timers tend to get their feathers ruffled when people use the term "hacker" incorrectly.
Unfortunately, that's not the way the English language works. Unlike some other languages - such as French, where you have an academy of experts who decide what each word means and invent new words as required - the meaning of words in English is decided by usage.
i.e. If people use a word to mean a particular thing, then that is what it means.
This is why the full OED (Oxford English Dictionary) relies on quotations from publications to define words (as opposed to the editors at the OED attempting to write definitions of what they think words *should* mean).
The upshot of this is that the meanings of words change over time.
For example, the word "autobiography" is currently defined as a biography written by its subject. However, you will often see quotes from pop stars, footballers and so along the lines of: "That's so-in-so, he's the guy who wrote my autobiography."
(i.e. It was marketed as an autobiography, with the celebrity's name on the cover, but was actually written by a ghost-writer - and said celebrity is either so honest, or so stupid, that they quite happily "let the [non]secret out of the bag).
So my theory is that in fifty years time, the dictionary definition for "autobiography" will have changed to:
"A biography written either by, or with the permission of, its subject."
(i.e. it will have the same meaning as "authorised biography").
It will be wrong in my opinion, but if enough people use a word wrongly, then wrong becomes right.
