Sado
First Post
One of the important characters in the story is the crown prince of an evil empire who is supposed to be leading a military action to conquer a region inhabited by less advanced peaceful tribes. He becomes disgusted with the atrocities committed by his empire and ends up switching sides and uniting the tribes against the empire.
My question is, what would reasonably lead him to do this? He has been raised as royalty of this empire his whole life, trained to rule it with an iron fist as his forefathers had, with its values being instilled in him from an early age. What could have happened to him that would have made him sympathetic to the plight of the tribes and given him a respect for the freedom and justice and niceness that is lacking in the empire.
Would it make a difference if the empire wasn’t necessarily evil, but was more of a benevolent tyranny, more advanced than the tribes, wanting to “help” and “enlighten” the primitive tribes by bringing them out of their savagery and under the empire’s rule (whether the tribes wanted it or not)? If this empire thought they were actually doing something good for the tribes?
My question is, what would reasonably lead him to do this? He has been raised as royalty of this empire his whole life, trained to rule it with an iron fist as his forefathers had, with its values being instilled in him from an early age. What could have happened to him that would have made him sympathetic to the plight of the tribes and given him a respect for the freedom and justice and niceness that is lacking in the empire.
Would it make a difference if the empire wasn’t necessarily evil, but was more of a benevolent tyranny, more advanced than the tribes, wanting to “help” and “enlighten” the primitive tribes by bringing them out of their savagery and under the empire’s rule (whether the tribes wanted it or not)? If this empire thought they were actually doing something good for the tribes?