Altalazar
First Post
I think the feat is fine as it is, though I don't know why it calls the additional damage "sneak attack" damage. Damage is damage - even for a creature immune to crits and regular sneak attack damage, I'd say having additional damage done by a weapon actually stuck into you is "damage" damage and should work normally.
I also don't think that the "threat" of having a bunch of daggers put into someone is unbalancing. At the level the theif would have to be to do that effectively (and the general limitations on even getting a sneak attack) it isn't likely to do all that much. Especially when you consider you have wizards laying waste to portions of armies for 10d6 points of damage. 3d6 from some daggers that is avoidable in several ways doesn't seem like all that much. And that isn't even automatic - you have to get the sneak attack, you have to hit with all three of them. In fact, it sounds downright weak - it is more of a style thing than anything else. And it could prove useful, but it isn't going to break anything.
I'll take it...
I also don't think that the "threat" of having a bunch of daggers put into someone is unbalancing. At the level the theif would have to be to do that effectively (and the general limitations on even getting a sneak attack) it isn't likely to do all that much. Especially when you consider you have wizards laying waste to portions of armies for 10d6 points of damage. 3d6 from some daggers that is avoidable in several ways doesn't seem like all that much. And that isn't even automatic - you have to get the sneak attack, you have to hit with all three of them. In fact, it sounds downright weak - it is more of a style thing than anything else. And it could prove useful, but it isn't going to break anything.
I'll take it...