• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

New name for Warlord

What should Warlord be called?

  • Warlord is fine

    Votes: 88 36.7%
  • Battlesmith

    Votes: 2 0.8%
  • Cavalier

    Votes: 11 4.6%
  • Commander

    Votes: 29 12.1%
  • Herald

    Votes: 6 2.5%
  • Marshal

    Votes: 49 20.4%
  • Noble

    Votes: 7 2.9%
  • Strategist

    Votes: 3 1.3%
  • Tactician

    Votes: 8 3.3%
  • Warmaster

    Votes: 2 0.8%
  • Warmonger

    Votes: 2 0.8%
  • Something else (describe)

    Votes: 33 13.8%

Warlord is just fine with me, but then I generally don't give a damn what a class (or anything else) in the game is called, and I never make assumptions about something based on the name. All that affects my attitude to, and treatment of, a class is the mechanics. They could call the paladin "monkeyboy" and if the mechanics were the same I'd use it exactly the same way.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I would have said to ask Monte Cook for permission to call it "Warmain." That name works even better for me. :)
 


Felon said:
Damn, look at all the people who think warlord is "fine".

You mean "look at the minority who think warlord is "fine".

30% of the voters so far think warlord is fine, but almost 70% think it's not, and suggest something else.
 

Does anyone else think they ended up with 'warlord' mostly because they didn't want to call it 'noble', which is the usual name for a class with the role the warlord seems to be heading for?

(still thinks the 4e core classes should be cleric, fighter, mage, noble, ranger, and rogue, with paladin as a PrC)

Warlord's not awful, but they could do better.
 


drothgery said:
Does anyone else think they ended up with 'warlord' mostly because they didn't want to call it 'noble', which is the usual name for a class with the role the warlord seems to be heading for?

Err... I fail to see how granting extra actions, buffs, healing and stuff, has anything to do with nobility.

"Leader" in this context just means force multiplier. What is it with this fixation with the role labels?
 

Mortellan said:
Warlord sounds unheroic to me.

Travis Morgan would disagree. :)

warlord.jpg
 

I think Commander is best. 'One who commands.' If we look at D&D minis, that's the term they use for someone who leads a group.

Captain implies he has a boat or something.
Warlord implies he's going to conquer people.
Marshal has the problem of being a homonym.
 

Klaus said:
You mean "look at the minority who think warlord is "fine".

30% of the voters so far think warlord is fine, but almost 70% think it's not, and suggest something else.

As of this posting, Warlord is the single most popular name (even beating out 'something else').
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top