• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D (2024) New One D&D Playtest Includes 5 Classes & New Weapon Mastery System

Barbarian, Fighter, Sorcerer, Warlock, and Wizard

The latest playtest packet for One D&D has just landed, and features five classes (Barbarian, Fighter, Sorcerer, Warlock, and Wizard) and the new Weapon Mastery system.

In this new Unearthed Arcana document for the 2024 Core Rulebooks, we explore material designed for the next version of the Player’s Handbook. This playtest document presents the rules on the Weapon Mastery property, updates to weapons, new and revised spells, several new feats, and five classes: Barbarian, Fighter, Sorcerer, Warlock, and Wizard. You will also find an updated rules glossary that supercedes the glossary of any previous playtest documents.


 

log in or register to remove this ad

Remathilis

Legend
No, I'm saying sentiments like "warlock is half caster and has lost access to higher level spells" is ignoring that they deliberately shunted some of those features into a different place, while combining them with others. So now warlocks get standard half casting for most of their spell slots, and then a single source of higher level faux slots, rather than having a bunch of different features and invocations that replicate that same basic utility.

It's fine if you don't like the specific implementation, but just looking at the warlock table and jumping to conclusions - which is what a number of people seem to have done - isn't really telling the whole story.
Which is funny, since most people who are unfamiliar with pact magic assume the table is wrong anyway since the table says Max Spell Level is 5th but the warlock spell list went to 9th, not realizing that 6th-9th level spell slots were hidden in Mystic Arcanum.
 

log in or register to remove this ad









DarkCrisis

Reeks of Jedi
This is always 100% what WotC and TSR before it have meant by "backwards compatible." It confuses me a little that people don't understand that. It's exactly what it meant with 4e & Essentials. It's exactly what it meant with 3e and 3.5. It's exactly what it meant with 1e and 2e. It's exactly why the Monster Manual was the same for OD&D, B/X, and AD&D.

Imagine DMing a 2E game and a player says they are playing a 1E Elf Fighter/Wizard because he can wear ANY armor while casting spells. Backwards compatible! Sure technically.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top