sevenbastard
Legend
WOTC is avoiding controversy and so it makes sense they don't include a list of media, Lots of older fantasy has issues.
I'm amused I just said the complete opposite.
In my defence, I already have the 2014 inspirational lists. I do like the older books as well.I think the difference between you two highlights (one of?) the reasons for its removal.
Nerd rage is a real big problem for companies like WotC. No matter what they put in a new Appendix N, someone will be angry. Include too many new things, people will complain there's not enough of the classics. Include a lot of old stuff, people with use it to say they're stuck in the past. If an older author is problematic (like, for an example that shouldn't be controversial to call problematic, Lovecraft), it will become a point of contention. But if someone like Lovecraft was in Appendix N before and is now removed, that will also be a point of contention. And if a modern author got exposed as problematic while books were in print, that's yet another issue to deal with.
Sometimes, the only winning move is not to play.
In my defence, I already have the 2014 inspirational lists. I do like the older books as well.
I've added it to my Goodreads 'want to read' list. Now 294 books long.
Come to think of it, those inspirational reading lists from multiple sources is the reason it is so big.
I think the difference between you two highlights (one of?) the reasons for its removal.
Nerd rage is a real big problem for companies like WotC. No matter what they put in a new Appendix N, someone will be angry. Include too many new things, people will complain there's not enough of the classics. Include a lot of old stuff, people will use it to say they're stuck in the past. If an older author is problematic (like, for an example that shouldn't be controversial to call problematic, Lovecraft), it will become a point of contention. But if someone like Lovecraft was in Appendix N before and is now removed, that will also be a point of contention. And if a modern author got exposed as problematic while books were in print, that's yet another issue to deal with.
Sometimes, the only winning move is not to play. FWIW, as a customer I would love a new Appendix N, but if I were an editor there I'd probably cut it out, too.
The 2014 Players handbook and DMG both had inspirational reading sections. I have also seen them in other RPGs.Wasn't appendix N 1e only? I don't recall ever seeing anything like that in any other edition so it's not surprising that it doesn't exist for the current edition.
Not just that; even a curated inspirational reading list can quickly become unfortunate because of things not public knowledge at the time of publication. You never know if a fantasy author is gonna be the next Rowling or Gaiman.WOTC is avoiding controversy and so it makes sense they don't include a list of media, Lots of older fantasy has issues.