D&D (2024) No Appendix N Equivalent?


log in or register to remove this ad

I'm amused I just said the complete opposite.

I think the difference between you two highlights (one of?) the reasons for its removal.

Nerd rage is a real big problem for companies like WotC. No matter what they put in a new Appendix N, someone will be angry. Include too many new things, people will complain there's not enough of the classics. Include a lot of old stuff, people will use it to say they're stuck in the past. If an older author is problematic (like, for an example that shouldn't be controversial to call problematic, Lovecraft), it will become a point of contention. But if someone like Lovecraft was in Appendix N before and is now removed, that will also be a point of contention. And if a modern author got exposed as problematic while books were in print, that's yet another issue to deal with.

Sometimes, the only winning move is not to play. FWIW, as a customer I would love a new Appendix N, but if I were an editor there I'd probably cut it out, too.
 
Last edited:

I think the difference between you two highlights (one of?) the reasons for its removal.

Nerd rage is a real big problem for companies like WotC. No matter what they put in a new Appendix N, someone will be angry. Include too many new things, people will complain there's not enough of the classics. Include a lot of old stuff, people with use it to say they're stuck in the past. If an older author is problematic (like, for an example that shouldn't be controversial to call problematic, Lovecraft), it will become a point of contention. But if someone like Lovecraft was in Appendix N before and is now removed, that will also be a point of contention. And if a modern author got exposed as problematic while books were in print, that's yet another issue to deal with.

Sometimes, the only winning move is not to play.
In my defence, I already have the 2014 inspirational lists. I do like the older books as well.
 

In my defence, I already have the 2014 inspirational lists. I do like the older books as well.

To be sure, I'm not saying you guys are part of the nerd rage.

Yet...

watching i see you GIF


:p
 

I've added it to my Goodreads 'want to read' list. Now 294 books long.

Come to think of it, those inspirational reading lists from multiple sources is the reason it is so big.

For you or anyone else interested you can read the chapters here:


I love the audiobook but this is good for people who want to look at words I think.
 

Honest question: Do we need an Appendix N?

It seems to me more productive to tell people to make lists of the media THEY find foundational and awesome, and to then use that as inspiration for their own content. Even better, perhaps we could set up some kind of....internet-based dispatch record thing. Then people could share what media they found inspiring, so that others could then be exposed to things they hadn't seen before, recommended by those who directly and personally enjoyed it, rather than an impersonal list complied and trimmed by editors who have probably never read/watched three quarters of the entries.

Sadly, no such internet dispatch record thing exists. Would be super cool for discussing TTRPGs with others though!
 

I think the difference between you two highlights (one of?) the reasons for its removal.

Nerd rage is a real big problem for companies like WotC. No matter what they put in a new Appendix N, someone will be angry. Include too many new things, people will complain there's not enough of the classics. Include a lot of old stuff, people will use it to say they're stuck in the past. If an older author is problematic (like, for an example that shouldn't be controversial to call problematic, Lovecraft), it will become a point of contention. But if someone like Lovecraft was in Appendix N before and is now removed, that will also be a point of contention. And if a modern author got exposed as problematic while books were in print, that's yet another issue to deal with.

Sometimes, the only winning move is not to play. FWIW, as a customer I would love a new Appendix N, but if I were an editor there I'd probably cut it out, too.

You say that and yet...

Lovecraft the person had terrible, harmful views. He was highly xenophobic which makes his horror stories, which are about xenophobia even more horrific. There is a realness about them that is instructive in the ways that xenophobia manifests and the harm it does. Something that makes horror really good is realizing the horrible views that are buried deep in ourselves that we like to pretend we don't have when xenophobic instincts are part of us.

He is long dead so supporting the work is not actually supporting him and the creation of more work by him. It does support derivative works though which have been made by good people who further explore those themes.

I argue that if that genre is interesting to someone it is good to start with a few of his stories (which are mostly quite short).
 

Wasn't appendix N 1e only? I don't recall ever seeing anything like that in any other edition so it's not surprising that it doesn't exist for the current edition.
 

Wasn't appendix N 1e only? I don't recall ever seeing anything like that in any other edition so it's not surprising that it doesn't exist for the current edition.
The 2014 Players handbook and DMG both had inspirational reading sections. I have also seen them in other RPGs.
 


Remove ads

Top