It is just a flat spell failure chance, the same as a Wizard in armour.(Psi)SeveredHead said:It does seem kind of random when it uses its primary ability, wild surge, which isn't well balanced either. I'll probably vote off the bad psionic classes last, but it and the soulknife are both begging to get kicked off the island.
Rystil Arden said:It is just a flat spell failure chance, the same as a Wizard in armour.
I'm playing a rogue/swashbuckler right now that I'm quite enjoying. However, I agree with Psi-Severed Head that d20 Modern does this much better with the Fast Hero already. My vote was for Warmage. That's too narrow a niche, IMO, and amongst the least interesting of those that's left. Then again, I'm not very familiar with the new classes from books like Tome of Magic or Incarnum; I have, but have not read those books.ehren37 said:I'm voting off the swashbuckler. Why is it so hard to make a lightly armored fighter thats DECENT?
That's not a very useful statement. So is rolling a Concentration check, a Caster Level check, or a Ranged Touch attack roll. The point is, the Wilder's mechanics are not any more random than any d20 core mechanic. They do not have wildly diverging results on a chart. They merely have a roll for success or failure. By the way, I actually like the Wild Mage, so I'm not trying to 'defend' the Wilder here. In fact, I'll admit that Aesthetic Monk has valid points about the class with which I agree--just play a Psion with Overchannel and Talented.(Psi)SeveredHead said:Rolling a percentile is random.
Felix said:Gone I hope will be the Favored Soul. In this dish we add a dash of Sorcerer casting, a heaping of divine spells, and a measure of class abilities; it renders: no flavor. Thbbbt.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.