November Previews: Complete Warrior, Dracomonicon & Dragoneye

[John Crichton]

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/iw/20031116a

More miniatures, mmmmm.

Complete Warrior is something that I will probably buy but I would like to know more of before I do.

Already have the Draconomicon. Good stuff.

 

[Knight Otu]

It would have been nice if the Complete Warrior previews had included some of the new material instead of updated material.
And the Draconomicon previews are a bit too long.

 

[BrooklynKnight]

i'm drooling over the minatures!

 

[TroyXavier]

I don't even collect the miniatures and I want that red dragon.
Really nice to see they updated the Rage Mage. I always liked that class.

 

[Pants]

I don't even collect the miniatures and I want that red dragon.
Really nice to see they updated the Rage Mage. I always liked that class.

What book was the Rage Mage originally in?
Complete Warrior still looks iffy to me, although the Divine Cleaninsing pic was pretty cool.
However, the excerpt makes me want to have the Draconomicon even more.
The Red Dragon mini is pretty damn cool looking, especially for a prepainted plastic!

 

[NiTessine]

The Rage Mage was not in a book, but Dragon... Issue #277, the steampunk issue.

 

[Olive]

Yeah, those feats from CW are kinda annoying. I don't think they've changed at all! I'm gonna want some mpore previewds before I bother myself.

 

[Psion]

They brought back the rage mage?

Talk about your unworthy of republication concepts. (IMO).

 

[Nightfall]

They brought back the rage mage?

Talk about your unworthy of republication concepts. (IMO).

Well...I mean you already have a rage worthy arcane spellcaster in PG: Fighters and Barbarians with Ragewitch and Japhin(sp) Dynast.

 

[Wormwood]

They brought back the rage mage?

Talk about your unworthy of republication concepts. (IMO).

I don't have the original issue, so it's new to me (and my group).

That, coupled with the fact that it looks like a fun class to play, is all the more incentive for me to pick up the book.

Different strokes, I suppose.