Mark
CreativeMountainGames.com
It looks like, IMO, despite her preconceptions and apparent wish to cling to them, the author turned in a fairly informative and hopeful article, acknowledging what is attractive about gaming and the social upside that so rarely gets highlighted. I wonder why the NYT dispatched that particlular writer to cover the story? Does anyone know what being published on Feb 15th (a Tuesday) means in regard to how many offline people might have seen it?
