You do realize that would be pronounced "Frisk"Alzrius said:I've been thinking about this a lot. I propose that such a system should be called 4Esque.
Whizbang Dustyboots said:Didn't The Book of Experimental Might, which has a fair bit of parallel evolution, do pretty well?
See this as therapeutic, not reproductive cloning.Turanil said:Please don't clone 4e. Legal stuff aside, one is enough.
The point of combing through the OGL is to find all the existing terminology. It doesn't have to mean the same thing. It just has to read well when you write using it. If you can say that a power "pushes opponent back 10 feet" someone playing 4e reads that they already knows it doesn't provoke opportunity attacks. Or you can be explicit "can move target 10 feet in any direction. Such movement does not provoke attacks of opportunity." That's far more cumbersome than "shift target 2 squares". But still, it is understandable.arscott said:It's entirely possible that you might comb through enough OGL sources to create a game that plays almost exactly like 4e. But the terminology used will be entirely different at best. Products released under such a system will be confusing and difficult to use with the actual 4e rules.
Agreed. Though there might be ways around it if you could hand off to someone in a country that didn't recognize US jurisdiction as a silent partner and let them do the publishing and distribution from offshore.Skywalker said:Personally, I would be very cautious of such an idea. Leaving aside the merits of the arguments, it could bring down a world of hurt on you. If one thing about being a lawyer has taught me is is that everyone looses in litigation, unless you are big enough to soak the costs from the outset.