OK, when do you ever "NOT" use a power and do a basic attack?

Emirikol

Adventurer
I've been looking over the pregen fighter. I dont' get Cleave and reaping at will powers. Since they are "standard" actions, why would you EVER bother not using them?

jh
 

log in or register to remove this ad




That's it. You use basic attacks when you are given bonus attack actions from Opps or other powers, or in situations where you don't HAVE an appropriate attack power (like a low-level fighter's range attack) otherwise you use your powers.

Your at-wills are your signature shtick.

Fitz
 



Yep. The point of at-will attacks is to use them in place of a basic attack 90% of the time. The only times you don't are, as mentioned, when the rules specifically say you have to use a basic attack or if, for some reason, you don't want either of the effects of your at-will powers (maybe you don't want to push the guy you're attacking or kill the monster next to him yet, for some reason).
 

Emirikol said:
I've been looking over the pregen fighter. I dont' get Cleave and reaping at will powers. Since they are "standard" actions, why would you EVER bother not using them?

jh

When you wish to prolong your target's suffering - muhwa-hah-haaa :D

Instead of tormenting them with "I'm not touching you...", it's "I'm not killing you..."

Sorry, I haven't had enough to drink yet - at this point, I just think I'm funny :)
 

Note though, we have seen certain monsters where their "basic attack" is not basic. Such as the Phane:

:bmelee: Temporal Touch (standard; at-will)
Reach 2; +29 vs. Reflex; 2d8 + 10 damage, and the target is slowed until the end of the phane’s next turn. The phane shifts 4 squares before or after making this attack.

So, who knows perhaps Epic (maybe even Paragon) level characters could have Basic, At-Will Powers.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top