Old revisions thread (ignore)

[Steverooo]

And for the 45th time...

Don't get excited about the druid until you see him.

More tidbits:

Druid animal companions: The animal companion rules have changed; it's no longer purely a "HD = level" link. (There's a lot more to it than that, of course.) Since an awakened animal isn't an animal any more (it's a magical beast), it won't be able to serve as an animal companion (or a familiar or paladin's mount, for that matter). Such a creature could still be included in the party as a cohort (using the Leadership feat, for example), or simply as an NPC ally

Unless 3.5e changes it, the duration of Animal Friendship is "Instant", not "Permanent". Once friendly, the change in type affects it no more than a Polymorph would.

 

[Olgar Shiverstone]

Re: And for the 45th time...

Unless 3.5e changes it, the duration of Animal Friendship is "Instant", not "Permanent". Once friendly, the change in type affects it no more than a Polymorph would.

It may change, then. That tidbit is a paraphrased quote from Andy Collins.

 

[Olgar Shiverstone]

Added new skill & spell info as of Dragon 309.

 

[pech21]

On page 31 of Dngeon Mag 100, the 10th level Sorcerer has a BAB of 7/2 *i.e. the 3/4 prgression as cleric or rogue).

I'm hoping this is just an error, as it seems a bit too good....

 

[Dalamar]

On page 31 of Dngeon Mag 100, the 10th level Sorcerer has a BAB of 7/2 *i.e. the 3/4 prgression as cleric or rogue).

I'm hoping this is just an error, as it seems a bit too good....

Does the sorcerer in question have the spells per day and/or spells known as the 3E sorcerer?

 

[Ankh-Morpork Guard]

On page 31 of Dngeon Mag 100, the 10th level Sorcerer has a BAB of 7/2 *i.e. the 3/4 prgression as cleric or rogue).

I'm hoping this is just an error, as it seems a bit too good....

Not THAT could be interesting....not sure if its bad or good though. Just...interesting.

 

[pech21]

Does the sorcerer in question have the spells per day and/or spells known as the 3E sorcerer?

Seems to (don't have PHB in front of me)

 

[Olgar Shiverstone]

I'm betting typo on that one, since the Ogre Mage Sor 4 on page 42 has the correct BAB. Too bad there isn't another high-level Sor to double check (well, there is, but the 9th level Mind Flayer Sorcerer says "See Monster Manual pg xxx" -- WTF?)

 

[pech21]

I'm betting typo on that one, since the Ogre Mage Sor 4 on page 42 has the correct BAB. Too bad there isn't another high-level Sor to double check (well, there is, but the 9th level Mind Flayer Sorcerer says "See Monster Manual pg xxx" -- WTF?)

Since it specifically references the iteritive attack, and the familiar has the BAB of 7 as well, it seems just as likely that the Ogre Mage has the incorrect BAB.

Have posted this to Andy Collins board hoping for more info...

 

[JoeBlank]

On page 31 of Dngeon Mag 100, the 10th level Sorcerer has a BAB of 7/2 *i.e. the 3/4 prgression as cleric or rogue).

I'm hoping this is just an error, as it seems a bit too good....

That is flat-out crazy, man. I have said before that I suspect WoTC is sandbagging us when they say the changes to the sorcerer are minimal. If the option to switch out any spells at all, ever, is added then that is huge. 3/4 BAB would be beyond huge.

Of course, the sorcerer I am playing now is structured to avoid the low BAB. He has no ray or other ranged touch attack spells, and in fact has never made a roll to hit.