keterys
First Post
Greyhawk was the default setting for 3rd edition, with several gamebooks and a _massive_ number of adventures available through Living Greyhawk, for reference.Greyhawk first and foremost as that's been absent since 2e.
Greyhawk was the default setting for 3rd edition, with several gamebooks and a _massive_ number of adventures available through Living Greyhawk, for reference.Greyhawk first and foremost as that's been absent since 2e.
It was the default setting in name only. Some of the crunch matched, but much did not. Likewise, the modules were only loosly set in Greyhawk. And LG adventures are no longer available and far from official.Greyhawk was the default setting for 3rd edition, with several gamebooks and a _massive_ number of adventures available through Living Greyhawk, for reference.
Oh, I knew I had forgotten one. Yeah, I'd love to see Birthright again too.Even if I doubt that it is in the priority list of Wizards, I would love to see Birthright again![]()
Ah. That sounds a lot like someone who says there's been no Forgotten Realms support, because they don't like anything after (Time of Troubles, Spellplague, Sundering, etc).It was the default setting in name only. Some of the crunch matched, but much did not. Likewise, the modules were only loosly set in Greyhawk. And LG adventures are no longer available and far from official.
With Mearls' love of old D&D, it gives me hope that there will be some new Greyhawk material.That is to say, there's no indication to suggest that D&D Next support for Greyhawk would match the One True Greyhawk criteria.
3e was really a generic in terms of content with Greyhawk naming conventions. There was three or four really Greyhawk specific Prestige Classes and most of the lore was "Greyhawk" in the same way that 1e was "Greyhawk". Ditto the adventures.Ah. That sounds a lot like someone who says there's been no Forgotten Realms support, because they don't like anything after (Time of Troubles, Spellplague, Sundering, etc).
That is to say, there's no indication to suggest that D&D Next support for Greyhawk would match the One True Greyhawk criteria.
Sorry, I can't see it happening. WotC know the folly of trying to support too many settings; that's how they came to own D&D in the first place. They also know that their success with any non-FR setting in 4e was... limited.
Unless they're now willing to go down the route of licensing out settings again, I really can't see any non-FR setting getting any support outside of the e-magazines.
Greyhawk [/I]first and foremost as that's been absent since 2e.
Which was a pure delicacy to readI'd love to see Greyhawk make a return. I do have to mention that Greyhawk *did* show up in 3e (the Living Greyhawk Gazeteer, plus much stuff through Dragon magazine), and I wrote a 4e Greyhawk backdrop for Dragon last year.