[OOC] Hall of the Dwarven Lord

[Theroc]

Are the new rules to much? We could re-start just after meeting the wizard and make the small hop to Pathfinder Rules:
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Reference Document

Well, I personally got a bit confused, I'll check pathfinders RD and see if that's a bit easier.

 

[Leif]

WD, I'm for making this a Pathfinder rpg game! Let's see, I think that will make this my 4th PFRPG game, so far. (Maybe 5th?)

 

[HolyMan]

Well, I personally got a bit confused, I'll check pathfinders RD and see if that's a bit easier.

Posts say 1,001 congrats Theroc and I to had trouble with the true20 rules I believe they wanted to be more free flowing a do whatever you like style game and the damage system would make up for all the other rules not being present I couldn't make heads or tails of it lol

Three votes pathfinder need only one more player right?

HM

 

[Walking Dad]

Option A:
So, vote is continuing this adventure, using Pathfinder and restarting at the meeting with the wizard/ unknown 4th player?

Does anyone want to change/ re-create his character?

Option B:
So, you like Pathfinder rules and are not afraid trying something new and sign in here: http://www.enworld.org/forum/talking-talk/264016-pathfinder-recruiting-darksun-game.html

Option C:
Both A & B.

 

[Leif]

I've already agreed to Option C, haven't I??

 

[Theroc]

Mmm... was thinking of attempting option C, but I'm a bit confused with option A, as I haven't read the entire thread. Will I need to to know how to start things off?

Also, it seems Pathfinder adjusted classes and added/changed some feats. Are there any other major changes I'll need to take into account when creating a character?

 

[Leif]

As best I remember, Theroc, Option A is more or less a total re-start. Nothing significant happened before we got the party together, of that I am certain.

 

[Theroc]

As best I remember, Theroc, Option A is more or less a total re-start. Nothing significant happened before we got the party together, of that I am certain.

Oh, I didn't know where the "Wizard" came in or what part he played, so I was a bit lost.

So, can anyone inform me of any significant differences between standard 3.5 and Pathfinder, besides class and feat tweaks?

 

[Leif]

Oh, I didn't know where the "Wizard" came in or what part he played, so I was a bit lost.

So, can anyone inform me of any significant differences between standard 3.5 and Pathfinder, besides class and feat tweaks?

The wizard that we had was just like the wizard in most adventuring parties. No mystery there.

The whole point of Pathfinder was to make it work like 3.5, but with a few of the "problems" fixed. I never was really conscious of any of these prfoblems, so I'm not even sure what they supposedly are/were. But, like a few of these deatils are that rogues have d8 hitdice, sorcerers and wizards have d6, and things like that. If anything is different, it's safe to assume that the change will favor the player.

 

[Theroc]

The wizard that we had was just like the wizard in most adventuring parties. No mystery there.

Wizard was a PC then? I somehow had gotten the idea that the Wizard mentioned by WD was an NPC, hence all my confusion.

If not, then I'm not nearly as confused as I thought I was.