GnomeWorks
Adventurer
creamsteak said:
Well, that's 44 posts I don't have to wade through when we're in combat.
Thanks much, cs!
[OOC] Psionicle, Thread II [Update! Please read and post!]
- Thread starter GnomeWorks
- Start date
Well, that's 44 posts I don't have to wade through when we're in combat.
Thanks much, cs!
GnomeWorks
Adventurer
Conversion
Not having gotten much response to the question, "3e or 3.5", I plan on going with what I had planned on doing originally: a mix of the two.
In general, if there is a question, use 3e, unless I've specifically stated otherwise.
Thus far, I have to say the following:
Exclusive skills still exist.
Bards and Rangers are pure 3.5; all other classes but the Druid are 3e; the Druid is a mix (see below).
Wild Empathy doesn't exist; Animal Affinity remains, in its original 3e form.
Survival will be used, and replaces the two skills that it was supposed to replace (I believe they were Intuit Direction and Wilderness Lore).
These are subject to change; they aren't set in stone. If you have questions about something concerning which edition is being used, feel free to ask.
-----
Darkwolf, you asked about converting Narok. If you want to, that's fine, but I'm going to make some modifications to the 3.5 druid.
As I said before, Wild Empathy doesn't exist. Animal Affinity is an exclusive class skill.
For animal companions, use the 3e rules, ignoring all the 3.5 information; with the exception of the table concerning animal companion advancement, use 3e.
If there are any questions, please feel free to post.
[Edit - Concerning the HD of animal companions. I had been led to believe that druids' animal companions could not have HD's higher than half the druid's level. I just reread the 3e PH, and found that this is not the case. As such, follow the normal rules for animal friendship - you can't have more than your HD x2 in HD of animal friends. Thus, your panther would have 5 HD.]
Not having gotten much response to the question, "3e or 3.5", I plan on going with what I had planned on doing originally: a mix of the two.
In general, if there is a question, use 3e, unless I've specifically stated otherwise.
Thus far, I have to say the following:
Exclusive skills still exist.
Bards and Rangers are pure 3.5; all other classes but the Druid are 3e; the Druid is a mix (see below).
Wild Empathy doesn't exist; Animal Affinity remains, in its original 3e form.
Survival will be used, and replaces the two skills that it was supposed to replace (I believe they were Intuit Direction and Wilderness Lore).
These are subject to change; they aren't set in stone. If you have questions about something concerning which edition is being used, feel free to ask.
-----
Darkwolf, you asked about converting Narok. If you want to, that's fine, but I'm going to make some modifications to the 3.5 druid.
As I said before, Wild Empathy doesn't exist. Animal Affinity is an exclusive class skill.
For animal companions, use the 3e rules, ignoring all the 3.5 information; with the exception of the table concerning animal companion advancement, use 3e.
If there are any questions, please feel free to post.
[Edit - Concerning the HD of animal companions. I had been led to believe that druids' animal companions could not have HD's higher than half the druid's level. I just reread the 3e PH, and found that this is not the case. As such, follow the normal rules for animal friendship - you can't have more than your HD x2 in HD of animal friends. Thus, your panther would have 5 HD.]
Last edited:
GnomeWorks
Adventurer
Ruth and dkoz
TFO - you have six feats, and you're only supposed to have five. Also, if you could provide some history, that would be nice. If you don't want it to be common knowledge, just email it to me, but I would prefer if I had access to Ruth's background.
-----
As for dkoz... he hasn't posted in a couple months, and I haven't seen him on the boards lately. While I feel that it is mostly my fault that he hasn't posted (due to my mixing up of which test was which), I still think that we need to let go of players that aren't actively participating too much.
Thoughts and opinions?
TFO - you have six feats, and you're only supposed to have five. Also, if you could provide some history, that would be nice. If you don't want it to be common knowledge, just email it to me, but I would prefer if I had access to Ruth's background.
-----
As for dkoz... he hasn't posted in a couple months, and I haven't seen him on the boards lately. While I feel that it is mostly my fault that he hasn't posted (due to my mixing up of which test was which), I still think that we need to let go of players that aren't actively participating too much.
Thoughts and opinions?
The Forsaken One
Explorer
errr
1st level - Human racial, standard level 1 feat, fighter bonus feat
2nd level - fighter bonus feat
3rd level - standard level 3 feat
4th level - fighter bonus feat
6 feats and not 5.... (or where did I go wrong? I only got a 3.5 phb and no 3.0 :/ )
And I'll make up a background somewhere next week. Bit busy being creative for (one of) my own game(s) that I've been running for over a year IRL.
[EDIT: Demmit forgot the human + skillpoint, editing that /EDIT]
1st level - Human racial, standard level 1 feat, fighter bonus feat
2nd level - fighter bonus feat
3rd level - standard level 3 feat
4th level - fighter bonus feat
6 feats and not 5.... (or where did I go wrong? I only got a 3.5 phb and no 3.0 :/ )
And I'll make up a background somewhere next week. Bit busy being creative for (one of) my own game(s) that I've been running for over a year IRL.
[EDIT: Demmit forgot the human + skillpoint, editing that /EDIT]
Last edited:
GnomeWorks
Adventurer
Hmm, you're right, I was wrong - you're supposed to have six feats.
Zhure
First Post
Re: Ruth and dkoz
Sometimes players leave an online game and it's no one's fault. Differing posting schedules and pacing issues are usually the culprit. IRL, players leave games all the time because they can't attend. In post formats, this is exactly the same type of problems. The only real difference is posters tend to not explain why they don't show up anymore, so there's a tendency for the DM to feel it's his fault. It usually isn't.
GnomeWorks said:
Sometimes players leave an online game and it's no one's fault. Differing posting schedules and pacing issues are usually the culprit. IRL, players leave games all the time because they can't attend. In post formats, this is exactly the same type of problems. The only real difference is posters tend to not explain why they don't show up anymore, so there's a tendency for the DM to feel it's his fault. It usually isn't.
GnomeWorks
Adventurer
Alright, I'll work something out with dkoz's character. I have an idea, and I think it'll work fine... for the time being, Desimus is still with the party, but will be under DM control.
-----
Hey Jarval, if you're wondering about that knowledge check... you got a natural 20. Hence the large amount of information.
-----
Hey Jarval, if you're wondering about that knowledge check... you got a natural 20.
Hence the large amount of information.Similar Threads
