OotS #656 Is Up

[Dausuul]

...and damn, O-Chul can really soak up the punishment. A meteor swarm and a maximized lightning bolt, both from an epic-level caster (not to mention the disintegrate earlier, though presumably he made his save on that one), and still no X's in the eyes.

 

[Blackrat]

And linky: 656

Well, at least he didn't go down like a punk

 

[mhensley]

Next up - tear jerking scene where O-chul dies and MitD goes bonkers

 

[Vorput]

Well, that was anti-climactic...

 

[Asmor]

Impressive. This is the first time my feed reader (Google) picked up the ENWorld post before the OotS post. You work fast, Dausuul.

I must say, I'm a bit worried for The Big O. Xykon's "Now, where'd that elf go?" strongly implies that any threat O-Chul posed has been eliminated, which would imply (slightly less strongly) that O-Chul's been killed.

 

[Piratecat]

I must say, I'm a bit worried for The Big O. Xykon's "Now, where'd that elf go?" strongly implies that any threat O-Chul posed has been eliminated, which would imply (slightly less strongly) that O-Chul's been killed.

The laws of narrative causality argue against it!

 

[malraux]

Impressive. This is the first time my feed reader (Google) picked up the ENWorld post before the OotS post. You work fast, Dausuul.

I must say, I'm a bit worried for The Big O. Xykon's "Now, where'd that elf go?" strongly implies that any threat O-Chul posed has been eliminated, which would imply (slightly less strongly) that O-Chul's been killed.

That or Xykon has extreme ADD. Which strikes me as pretty likely.

 

[Storminator]

The laws of narrative causality argue against it!

Damn those narrative laws!

A lot of fiction lost its allure once I understood the law of limited characters. Can I have my fictional naivety back?

PS

 

[Mustrum_Ridcully]

Maybe if we beat you long enough with a stick on the head, we can remove that knowledge...

 

[Mircoles]