Felon said:Having a hodgepodge of other classes' abilities doesn't make a class powerful. Notice the d6 hit die, the lower armor proficiency, and the single good saving throw. Heck, I wish the cleric was only this broken.
Now, those Vanara guys? They are a bit bogus with that +2 Int and Wis for -2 Str.
satori01 said:The Sohei is wacked though, a bit too powerful.
satori01 said:The samurai is strong as well, easily better than a fighter, but this is OA after all.
satori01 said:Shugenja is decidely better than a sorcerer,(d6 hit points, more spells known, 4 skill points,) though it does have a signifigantly smaller,(and much cooler), thematic list.
Michael Tree said:
Specifically, they have virtually no directly offensive spells, far less than clerics, let alone druids or wizards, and also have fewer buffing spells. Shamans don't have Divine Favor, Greater Magic Weapon, or Divine Power, the cornerstones of the cleric's buffing arsenal. Don't be fooled by the martial arts feats, shamans are much weaker in combat than clerics.
In short, shamans are essentially clerics that trades off a lot of offensive power for some neat abilities that are mostly defensive in nature.
Southern Oracle said:When WotC hosted the designer chats for Oriental Adventures and the Psionics Handbook, they said the classes in each supplement were not balanced when compared to the core classes, only to the classes for those respective settings.
satori01 said:The samurai is strong as well, easily better than a fighter, but this is OA after all.
satori01 said:The Sohei is wacked though, a bit to powerful.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.