Re: Re: Re: Re: (OT) Monte Cook's most recent rant.....
Green Knight said:
I totally agree with you, Sigil. There's nothing inherently courageous about suicide, nevermind someone who kills innocent people before killing himself.
I couldn't agree with you more: there is
nothing inherent about it. It's all situational.
Is a guy who throws himself on a grenade to save others from death courageous? I think so. What if he just finished killing a bunch of people beofer doing it? Still courageous? I think so too.
But he was saving people on
his side of the war and killing the enemy right?
I don't think that impacts valor of this soldier's suicide.
Is the guy who kills his wife and then kills himself courageous? No, he's a coward. He killed himself to avoid responsibility for his actions.
Like I said above, nothing inherent, all situational.
Same with the terrorists. Not only did they choose a course of action which would guarantee they'd never have to face justice for it in life, but they chose a course of action which they believed they'd be REWARDED for in the afterlife. That's makes them cowardly and selfish.
They chose no such action. So may thhings could have gone wrong (things that would virtually
guarantee they would have to "face justice in this life") that I am stunend by the enormity of the effort.
This wasn't a guy killing himself and his family. That kind of thing could not really "foul up" unless he (A) wasn't serious about it, or (B) shot himself into unconsciousness.
This was an effort that went beyond simply "crime" to a nearly comic-book level of "Super Villainy". 20-odd men learned to Fly 747's, they snuck weapons aboard the planes, they flew them into restricted airspace. To equate this with a common three person murder/suicide is a gross oversimplification.