Nightfall said:Wel, I've been sick of it since then 95 season ended. You can see how much has changed.
MulhorandSage said:Though the Canucks tonight were beyond ugly. The only thing that would have made it more of a farce is if the ex-Iraqi information minister had shown up and declared how badly we were annihilating the Blues.
Nightfall said:Wel, I've been sick of it since then 95 season ended. You can see how much has changed.
Agamon said:
Not sure I get the "yay Canadian team" thing. Half the players on the teams aren't Canadian; the playoff-bound Canadian teams' best players are Sundin, Hossa, Naslund and Salo. Some of the Canadian teams' owners aren't Canadian. The only reason I could see is that success means there's less chance of the team moving to the States (of course, there's no chance of that for the Leafs). Don't get me wrong, I'm all Go Canada GO in the international tournaments, but if the Leafs were to make the final, I'd be cheering for whoever came from the West.
PowerWordDumb said:
That's okay, it's not a nationalist hate-everyone-else thing. For that matter, more players in the league are canadian than from any other nation, so it's not because of team composition so much (although I'm a big fan of the prototypical big canadian player playing hockey the "right" way).
It's most important that the cup finally comes home to Canada where it belongs, hence the "yay canadian teams" thing. I happen to cheer for the Leafs, but should one of the other canadian teams bring the cup home, I'm still happy on some level.
Sorry, here comes a huge overgeneralization, but the american fans (other than Boston/Detroit/Chicago/New York) just don't appreciate the cup the way the canadians do. It's part of the national psyche, and it belongs here.