i always liked Trapper John more than B.J. a much more sardonic wit, whereas B.J. was "nicer."
me too. Frank Burns was never more than a caricature of a bad guy. Winchester was a good foil to the duo without being bad. he had a lot of depth of character -- enough so that on many occasions, he and Hawkeye could even unite against something else.
i always liked Col. Potter better than Col. Blake, too. again, Blake was a caricature of an inefficient bureaucrat. Potter had a lot of soul. Blake was like your ineffectual vice-principal. Potter was like your favorite grumpy grampa.
Teflon Billy said:Me? I like Winchester. A much deeper and more inherently funny character than Burns.
me too. Frank Burns was never more than a caricature of a bad guy. Winchester was a good foil to the duo without being bad. he had a lot of depth of character -- enough so that on many occasions, he and Hawkeye could even unite against something else.
i always liked Col. Potter better than Col. Blake, too. again, Blake was a caricature of an inefficient bureaucrat. Potter had a lot of soul. Blake was like your ineffectual vice-principal. Potter was like your favorite grumpy grampa.
