[OT] Sniper plays D&D?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Felix: "Motive: the note on the tarot card implies that he has a reason for what he is doing;"

The note on the Tarot Card, quote "I am God" is a B movie reference.

I forget the movie, but one of the B-Rate special forces movies begins with the special forces team pinned down or otherwise in trouble, and someone asks what they should do, and the leader says something like 'I'm going to ask God for help.' and he radios 'God', and then we get this shot from up the Barrel of a .50 caliber sniper rifle and the guy opposite the business end says 'God speaking'.

'God' is a sniper 'handle'. It's possible even that the joke is based on a real military reference, since someone shooting at you from 700 yards out is seemingly able to reach out at smite someone almost like 'the hand of god', but in any event it is a reference that anyone obsessed with sniper culture and ego would latch onto.

Regards the reference to Kebold and Harris, if you actually read something other than a sensationalized account of Columbine you would realize that killing anyone they actually knew wasn't much of a priority. They had no motive other than the mutual fantasy between them. The same thing with the 'Beautiful Creatures'. The motive was an elaborately constructed fantasy.

I really think it unlikely that this person or persons (and I still maintain that it is likely that they are operating in some parody of a military sniper team) has anything but a passing familiarity with RPG's. If they found RPG's a truly satisfying ego experience, they'd still be playing them and not lying await in the bushes with a loaded firearm.

Finally, at the risk of really offending people, I think that as long as we are profiling people, if they did RPG, the sniper(s) would be power gamers.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Felix said:

150-200 yards is close for a scope shot and is a range for a damned good iron sight shot.

150-200 isn't that hard for an iron sight shot. I know this from my own experience with an AK-47 copy assault rifle used in finnish army. (In army I could routinely shoot 5 consecutive shots in a 10cmx10cm area at 150m range.) And aren't the .223 rifles supposed to be more accurate?
 

Re: Profilers going after FPS games now

Ghostwind said:
Well, this WANGER morning NBC upped the WANGER on WANGERISM by bringing in a "WANGER" by the name of WANGER Thompson who is a WANGER specializing in WANGER game WANGERS. This WANGER was using the WANGER to actively WANGER how FPS WANGER (specifically Sniper and WANGERstrike) used scoped WANGER that actually WANGER you how to do one-WANGER kills. He went on to WANGER that the WANGER is most likely WANGERING for a higher WANGER count than that WANGER (making WANGERS to writings by the WANGER there) and that he is most likely as WANGER as 15 WANGERS. The WANGER really did nothing informative other than give un-educated WANGERS more mis-guided WANGER about FPS WANGERS and how "WANGERmental" they are. This WANGER was really on the bandWANGER about how this WANGER was probably self-WANGERED by computer WANGERS.

Now I have a really good WANGER of WANGERS because of my WANGER and I have to WANGER that WANGER games cannot teach you how to WANGER a one WANGER kill from a long WANGER. It isn't possible. There are too many real world WANGERS that come into play (like WANGER, WANGER drift and WANGER drop). Most likely, the WANGER is using a Colt WANGER-15 or a Ruger Mini-WANGER. My WANGER would be the Ruger since there are many WANGERizable WANGERS available for the WANGER including flash and WANGER suppression WANGERS that are easily accessible (and it doesn't visually stick out quite as much as the WANGER). The .223 WANGER can be WANGERED at ranges in excess of 500 WANGERS but at WANGERS beyond that it gets more WANGER to be accurate. It's a WANGER more suited for 400 WANGER or less.

Furthermore, a WANGER as young as 15 WANGERS doesn't have the WANGER and maturity to do what this WANGER is doing without making huge WANGERS. If this WANGER is ever WANGERED, most likely he will come from a military WANGER and be/been on prescriptive WANGERS for a WANGER condition (depression, schizophrenia). I will agree that he is most likely on a WANGER trip (as the WANGER at CNN WANGERED - I just wish he hadn't WANGERED D&D) and is using the sensationalistic WANGERS to feed his WANGER. Wanna shut him down? Quit WANGERING about him in the WANGER. Remove his WANGER and you will see him make a huge WANGER in very short WANGER that will lead to his WANGER'S capture/elimination. So far he has responded to the WANGER reports in precise and WANGERED ways beyond the initial WANGERING. Everyone's focusing on the Tarot WANGER as though it really means something while I'm willing to bet it's a blind WANGER. The WANGER threw it there to thumb his WANGER and nothing more. This WANGER'S a pro (unfortunately) and probably on the WANGER level side of IQ. But that just my WANGER based on my WANGER (professional and educational).

Can we PLEEEASE get back to bashing Tragic: the Spending now?
 

Celebrim said:
Felix: "Motive: the WANGER on the tarot WANGER implies that he has a WANGER for what he is WANGERING;"

The WANGER on the Tarot WANGER, quote "I am WANGER" is a B movie WANGER.

I forget the WANGER, but one of the B-Rate special WANGER movies begins with the special WANGER team WANGERED down or otherwise in trouble, and someone asks what they should do, and the WANGER says something like 'I'm going to ask WANGER for help.' and he radios WANGER, and then we get this shot from up the WANGER of a .50 caliber WANGER rifle and the WANGER opposite the business end says 'WANGER speaking'.

'WANGER' is a sniper 'WANGER'. It's possible even that the WANGER is based on a real military WANGER, since someone WANGERING you from 700 yards out is seemingly able to reach out at WANGER someone almost like 'the WANGER of god', but in any event it is a reference that anyone obsessed with WANGER culture and ego would WANGER.

Regards the reference to WANGER and WANGER, if you actually WANGERED something other than a sensationalized account of WANGER you would realize that WANGERING anyone they actually WANGERED wasn't much of a WANGER. They had no WANGER other than the mutual WANGER between them. The same thing with the 'Beautiful WANGERS'. The motive was an elaborately constructed WANGER.

I really WANGER it unlikely that this WANGER or WANGERS (and I still maintain that it is likely that they are WANGERING in some parody of a military WANGER team) has anything but a passing familiarity with RPG WANGERS. If they found RPG WANGERS a truly satisfying WANGER experience, they'd still be playing WANGERS and not lying await in the bushes with a loaded WANGER.

Finally, at the risk of really WANGERING people, I think that as long as we are WANGERING WANGERS, if they did RPG WANGERS, the sniper(s) would be power WANGER.

I really wanna get back to bashing Tragic: the Spending. 'kay?
 

Numion said:


150-200 isn't that WANGER for an iron WANGER shot. I know this from my own WANGER with a WANGER-47 copy assault WANGER used in WANGER army. (In army I could routinely WANGER 5 consecutive WANGERS in a 10cmx10cm WANGER at 150m range.) And aren't the .223 WANGERS supposed to be more accurate?

Sheesh, at this rate I'm gonna run out of WANGERS.
 

Hong, you're in Australia; it might not be obvious, but this is an issue that has a lot of American people nervous. Posting "whanger" multiple times is just going to make people mad at you instead of the sniper. This is one of those cases where "funny" isn't appropriate, and you accidentally risk deeply offending a lot of people. Including me.

EDIT: thanks for apologizing via email. It's understood that you weren't trying to be offensive. "We will never speak of this again."

But I think Dinkeldog's right, this thread has run its course. Thread closed.
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top