silentspace
First Post
I think games should reflect reality. That's my big problem with chess /sarcasm 

Lord Pendragon said:The Monk class as written definitely embraces the Eastern concept of unarmed combat, both in the flavor text, and the abilities themselves.
Are we having the same conversation? Every single poster on this thread agrees that it was an Olympic sport and an important recreational passtime in the Hellenistic world. Nobody is disputing this historical fact.Arkhandus said:Google pankration (or maybe it was pankratian). I don't remember the appropriate link, but a few times people have posted a link to a martial arts site that describes the history and such of the ancient Greek unarmed fighting discipline called pankration, which apparently might have been used in the original Olympics as a competition. I don't remember if it was proven or not, but there are modern practicioners of pankration.
And your point is...? People translate words every day. You just did it yourself. Why are you using the term "Shaolin monk"? Because you don't know an Asian word for monk. Which is fine. Neither do I. If calling these individuals "monks" is a "bad translation" then why are you doing so? I think "monk" is a perfectly adequate translation. Just as "cleric" is a perfectly adequate translation for the Chinese word for priest. Or "fighter" is a perfectly adequate translation for the Chinese word for "warrior."The term Monk is entirely a Western name, anyway. It has nothing to do with unarmed combat or anything, it was probably only associated with such after bad translations of Japanese texts about Shaolin monks, who were akin to their Western equivalents except trained in martial arts.
Again, I ask: why is it important to locate the archetype for this class within Western tradition? Why do we have to claim this archetype is transcultural? Can't we just admire this Asian archetype for what it is and employ it when appropriate? We know what warriors who saw Hercules and Prometheus as patrons were like. They were, unsurprisingly, totally unlike Shaolin monks.Assume some deity like Hercules, or a titan like Prometheus, empowers mortals who train like the Monk class dictates. And yeah, call them pugilists or something. Or luchadores. :^D
NeutralGood said:Some people just cannot get the idea of a non-oriental monk, too many Bruce Lee movies.
fusangite said:We know what warriors who saw Hercules and Prometheus as patrons were like. They were, unsurprisingly, totally unlike Shaolin monks.
fusangite said:Are we having the same conversation? Every single poster on this thread agrees that it was an Olympic sport and an important recreational passtime in the Hellenistic world. Nobody is disputing this historical fact.
But does this mean there should be D&D classes based on discus throwing, marathon running, etc.? Of course not! I mean WOTC will stoop to anything in creating as prestige class but I have yet find "Discus Thrower" as a PrC. SNIP.
Tonguez said:The fact remains though that Hercules the wrestler (and the Biblical Samson) do provide archetypes for Unarmed fighters in a Western setting which is all that matters in the end.
Agreed the monk class doesn't really recreate Hercules but thats not the point and don't forget monks do use weapons