Henry said:Hollywood:
Luke:
I appreciate your weighing in on this. Since it's been at least six months since I looked at either RPM or Twin Rose CS, I haven't been up on current status for RPM. I also appreciate the clarification on your lack of upgrade charge, since I couldn't find the definitive answer to that on your site this morning. Most softwares do not have free upgrades for their major version number changes, and I commend you for doing it, in an age where it's non-standard.
No problem. Not weighing in, just clarifying some RPM points.
On my website: 4th menu option is "Register RPM", and line 6 on that page under "Benefits of registering" is "Free updates of RolePlayingMaster".
I take your point, however, since I've answered about 4 e-mails from current RPM users asking me if they needed to pay to upgrade to RPM 3.0 !!! I've also spent a fair bit of "internet phone time" showing big-time RPM fans just how much they can actually do with the program. I really sell myself short on advertising RPM's capabilities


Thanks for frank words on DMF, Todd. Perhaps Chris (TwinRose) has something to say about making money from RPG software? I think you'll find that we all either start out, or end up, doing it for the love of it.
In the end, it appears that even PCGen are going to see quality benefits in moving to a cost-model.
In the final analysis, I'd suggest that WotC were saved by community doing it for the love of it. PCGen saves ETools? If so, it was the existence of a dedicated group doing it for love that saved the failed commercial attempt.
Even Wizards couldn't make money from RPG software ??? Ironies abound, and we live in interesting times...
Regards,