jeffh said:
Automatically assuming your opponent holds an idiotic position rather than a rational one is pretty damn condescending.
Well I guess we'll just have to disagree there.
Disagreeing with one extreme view [playing a human is pointless] does not automatically mean I hold the opposite extreme view [playing a non-human is pointless].
Except the view you were disagreeing wasn't "Humans are pointless". Here, let me quote the passage you were responding to:
Humans are already the most overused and boring race. I can't even remember the last time someone other than me ran a non-human in our group. I've never run a human just because everyone else does; that and they seem so boring. A bonus feat and skills and nothing else? Why don't I just play half-orc? At least they get Darkvision.
I would die of boredom for the first 2 months until we got new races. Terrible idea.
"Humans are
overused and boring." He even says "I can't even remember the last time someone other than me ran a non-human in our group" designating that everyone in his group plays Humans. The overused come from the fact that, despite the multitude of other options, the
only race chosen is Human; I love playing wizards, but if everyone in my group played wizards, I'd get sick of them too, because that's all I'm surrounded by.
He acknowledged they get a free feat and skill points. That's not Pointless, given how feats are precious commodities in D&D. Merely that there's no variation with Races at his table, despite the copious options.
You dismissed his point of "Playing a human is boring" by saying there are lots of interesting people. That's... not really refuting his point. He didn't say "There exists no interesting people". His example of "not boring" is even a half-orc who at least gets dark-vision; the point being that they hold Different thematic abilities.
So how else am I supposed to take what you said?
If you think "Playing Humans is boring because they're overused" necessitates the response "There exists interesting humans", then I think it's totally logical for me to refute that with "We don't need classes and magic to play interesting people". Because the races are there to add variety just like the classes and magic is.
If anything, you turned his statement into a strawman.