Garnfellow
Explorer
Creatures with low HD but many powerful special abilities push the CR and LA systems to their limit and beyond. Such design was pretty common in older versions of the game, though, particularly for "faerie" or "girlie" monsters (my apologies that I cannot think of a better way to characterize this group).
I think most monsters that fit this profile were radically redesigned for 3.0 or 3.5 -- either given more HD or by having their powers reduced. (Hello, nymph.)
So I think that the +4 LA for a pixie is probably fair, but I also think the pixie as written is probably not a playable character race. In many situations a pixie is going to be much too weak or much too strong.
I think one could "fix" the pixie by creating a stripped down base version of the race, with say LA +0 or +1 benefits. And then create racial substitution levels (a la Races of the XXX) for the sorcerer class that would gradually backfill the missing pixie abilities. So a low-level pixie sorcerer would have only a fraction of the tradition pixie special abilities, but a high level pixie would have them all.
I think most monsters that fit this profile were radically redesigned for 3.0 or 3.5 -- either given more HD or by having their powers reduced. (Hello, nymph.)
So I think that the +4 LA for a pixie is probably fair, but I also think the pixie as written is probably not a playable character race. In many situations a pixie is going to be much too weak or much too strong.
I think one could "fix" the pixie by creating a stripped down base version of the race, with say LA +0 or +1 benefits. And then create racial substitution levels (a la Races of the XXX) for the sorcerer class that would gradually backfill the missing pixie abilities. So a low-level pixie sorcerer would have only a fraction of the tradition pixie special abilities, but a high level pixie would have them all.