-
NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.
Players who think out of the box
- Thread starter DragonKnight88
- Start date
If your group is all about the "game" then you handled the situation just fine using abstract dice rolls to determine the outcome. The two things you could have done to improve the situation were to make the players aware of how it would be resolved ahead of time and then not allow them to argue after the fact.
If your group is based on role-playing characters through a story then utilizing player knowledge for the character's benefit is a failure of role-playing and they should not be rewarded for engineering a complicated scientific or mathematical plan with characters that lack that kind of knowledge.
Explosives? Somehow securely attached to a boulder well enough that they aren't detonated or destroyed before the avalanche reaches a precise destination? And this is all calculated precisely and timed perfectly? And the target is predictable and stationary?
Suppose all of those questions can be over-looked, the players should not know the results of their plan just by watching it happen. They should see no more than the destruction of the roof, the explosion, and a cloud of dust. They should have to work to figure out the results.
Also . . . CONSEQUENCES! There should ALWAYS be consequences for every action. The bigger the action the bigger the consequences. What is the logical fall-out of their actions?
If your group is based on role-playing characters through a story then utilizing player knowledge for the character's benefit is a failure of role-playing and they should not be rewarded for engineering a complicated scientific or mathematical plan with characters that lack that kind of knowledge.
Explosives? Somehow securely attached to a boulder well enough that they aren't detonated or destroyed before the avalanche reaches a precise destination? And this is all calculated precisely and timed perfectly? And the target is predictable and stationary?
Suppose all of those questions can be over-looked, the players should not know the results of their plan just by watching it happen. They should see no more than the destruction of the roof, the explosion, and a cloud of dust. They should have to work to figure out the results.
Also . . . CONSEQUENCES! There should ALWAYS be consequences for every action. The bigger the action the bigger the consequences. What is the logical fall-out of their actions?
Yeah I would never let the players know how many hit points it had
As stated above, this is a high fantasy game where some classes can even overcome nearly infinite damage and not die.
An 11th level Long Death Monk with 1 ki point can survive a nuclear blast at ground zero.
Your players just need to accept that while their plan was really good, it wasn't good enough to auto-kill your BBEG. I'd definitely reward them though either with a boon of XP and/or maybe they find some powerful magic items if they search through the rubble.
As stated above, this is a high fantasy game where some classes can even overcome nearly infinite damage and not die.
An 11th level Long Death Monk with 1 ki point can survive a nuclear blast at ground zero.
Your players just need to accept that while their plan was really good, it wasn't good enough to auto-kill your BBEG. I'd definitely reward them though either with a boon of XP and/or maybe they find some powerful magic items if they search through the rubble.
Similar Threads
D&D General
Why Combat is a Fail State - Blog and Thoughts
