genshou
First Post
That's what I was responding to. I didn't bring realism into it and never intended to. I simply responded to your statement which had initially brought realism into the discussion. That's why I'm asking you to explain what this "realism" is and why it matters. Still, since I did say that assertion was missing the point of realism, I'll explain.genshou said:Demanding that we all use 3d6 in order because it is "realistic" is really missing the point of realism.prosfilaes said:If you don't want to play a realistic character, then how does rolling stats help realism?
This is not a game about playing peasants who till the fields until they die. That's what I do in the real world, metaphorically. A character with a 50 point-buy is no more or less "realistic" than a character with a 15 point-buy. Using a higher value for the PCs, or using rolling methods more likely to generate more heroic characters is simply a method of "selecting" only certain individuals from the gene pool.
Every person in this world is "realistic", but that doesn't mean the "PCs" who do all the heroic stuff are just as likely to have a 3 Constitution as the average person. Those people don't end up being heroes. They end up living in a hospital their entire lifespan of 3 weeks.