Polearm Feats

[Nemesis Destiny]

So, you parse my innocuous "wow, cheesy" as a "knee-jerk 'nerf!' reaction"?

I guess that's why you keep repeating yourself, because you didn't seem to "get it" the first time.

 

[Aulirophile]

So, you parse my innocuous "wow, cheesy" as a "knee-jerk 'nerf!' reaction"?

I guess that's why you keep repeating yourself, because you didn't seem to "get it" the first time.

I was quoting the thread you linked. That you didn't actually read. Because you'd rather simplify things and have an opinion, but looking at facts and considering all the complexities of a situation results in a real answer.

Irony is priceless.

 

[Nemesis Destiny]

I was quoting the thread you linked. That you didn't actually read. Because you'd rather simplify things and have an opinion, but looking at facts and considering all the complexities of a situation results in a real answer.

Irony is priceless.

Irony. You're seeing it where none exists. And you're making an argument out of your own misunderstanding.

In response to now "getting" how Polearm Cheese works, after reading your and Draco's responses, AND that thread, I reply, "wow, cheesy."

Not the same as "knee-jerk 'nerf!'" At all. Where's the ironic part? Never once did I say it was overpowered, should be nerfed, or broken. You are putting words in my mouth, as I've seen you do countless times to others before. You don't even understand what my opinion truly is, let alone be able to suggest that I'd rather just "simplify things and have an opinion" without "considering the complexities."

Polearm Cheese. It's a good trick, when it works, but being not a moron, I can think of a dozen ways around it, even before you oh-so-helpfully suggested some for me.

 

[Aulirophile]

Irony. You're seeing it where none exists. And you're making an argument out of your own misunderstanding.

In response to now "getting" how Polearm Cheese works, after reading your and Draco's responses, AND that thread, I reply, "wow, cheesy."

Not the same as "knee-jerk 'nerf!'" At all. Where's the ironic part? Never once did I say it was overpowered, should be nerfed, or broken. You are putting words in my mouth, as I've seen you do countless times to others before. You don't even understand what my opinion truly is, let alone be able to suggest that I'd rather just "simplify things and have an opinion" without "considering the complexities."

Polearm Cheese. It's a good trick, when it works, but being not a moron, I can think of a dozen ways around it, even before you oh-so-helpfully suggested some for me.

Oh man.

I didn't say that was your reaction. It is the evaluation of if it is cheesy or not from thread you linked. Your thread. My point was had you actually read the thread you linked, rather then just quickly trying to find a way to justify calling it "cheese" you'd see that the writers of that thread agree it isn't cheesy. You did this in response to my answer of "people who are ignorant would rather have an opinion, with no basis, and remain ignorant, then go to the effort of realizing the opportunity cost, the trade-offs, and comparing it with other options, because being ignorant is simpler." The irony is you did exactly that by not actually reading the thread you linked (while attempting to belittle my answer by calling it "pop psychology").

 

[Nemesis Destiny]

Oh man.

I didn't say that was your reaction. It is the evaluation of if it is cheesy or not from thread you linked. Your thread. My point was had you actually read the thread you linked, rather then just quickly trying to find a way to justify calling it "cheese" you'd see that the writers of that thread agree it isn't cheesy. You did this in response to my answer of "people who are ignorant would rather have an opinion, with no basis, and remain ignorant, then go to the effort of realizing the opportunity cost, the trade-offs, and comparing it with other options, because being ignorant is simpler." The irony is you did exactly that by not actually reading the thread you linked (while attempting to belittle my answer by calling it "pop psychology").

I justify calling it "cheese" because it is "cheese" in the colloquial sense. That is precisely WHY I linked that thread. As if to say, "I meant it in the same sense as presented here." Do I really need to explain this again? Are you that desperate for a fight on the internet that you will continue to deliberately misunderstand in order to continue this pointless argument?

So yeah, I did actually read the thread. I was reading it while waiting for a response to my question. From someone who isn't you - but that's rather moot at this juncture.

If I'm belittling your answers, it's because you are making assumptions and failing to understand what's being said, and all the while doing it with a very condescending tone.