I sometimes respond as I read a thread, just to get my thoughts down, while reading the whole thread.It is polite to read the posts, and even useful for people who are interested in the thread topic.
It is also polite to welcome newcomers to the conversation who found the original post interesting but havent slogged thru the entire thread yet.
The difference to joining a conversation at a social gathering is that the newcomer doesn't hear a snippet of what you were talking about 3 hours ago before butting in. I think I would quickly try to extricate myself from a conversation where, every 30 seconds, someone new joined and repeated "actually, you're wrong, there are rules for poisons in the DMG".Nope. People can join in conversations when they want and leave them when they want. They should read the OP at least, but other than that, I don't see the rules as any different to joining a conversation at any other social gathering, especially if there are like 200 posts to read.
I wouldn't even allow someone to start reading unless they could demonstrate a decent familiarity with the 2000-post long first edition of the halfling thread from a few months ago.I think requiring someone to read the Halfling thread may be a form of torture.
It depends on which theology and when. The Renaissance speculative theology had an elementalist worldview comprising a Great Chain of Being, which transitioned fluidly from solid matter to ethereal spirit: Earth (solid), Water (liquid), Air (gas), Fire, and Spirit. In this sense, an angel that was made out of Spirit was perceived to take up some space even if their substance was more fine and less course. Similarly, a fairy was made out of Spirit thus was also able to shrink down its size − to about the size of a thumbnail. The fairy was fine, but not as fine as an angel who could shrink down even finer.Sed contra, as pure separated Intellects, all Angels have complete and total knowledge of dancing. However, on that point, since they have no material extension, they cannot dance, so an infinite number of angels can not-dance on the head of a pin. So, infinite divided by zero.
Quod Erat Demonstratum, y'all.
Yeah, one kinda has to, to engage a thread. Comment while the idea is fresh. If one waits until finishing the entire thread, one might forget some of the important points.I sometimes respond as I read a thread, just to get my thoughts down, while reading the whole thread.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.