fanboy2000
Adventurer
I allow them in my games, and my players do sometimes play psionic characters. I've never played a psionic PC though. Psionics never bothered my in fantasy, but then I'm not a big fan of standard fantasy.
Gez said:Like 'em. But mostly as a DM. I haven't played a psionic character yet. Not because I don't like them, but because I like other archetypes more.![]()
Rutterkins have brains? This must be an exception, as I wasn't aware of any demons with brains. Maybe vestigal brains, but certainly not functional ones?Shemeska said:...when he blew the back out of a Rutterkin's skull and made its brains leak out of its nose, ears and eyesockets...
Sammael said:Rutterkins have brains? This must be an exception, as I wasn't aware of any demons with brains. Maybe vestigal brains, but certainly not functional ones?
Heh. I hate monks and ninjas in standard D&D (and don't allow them in my game). I know what you mean by your former point, and it would bug me if I spent the time and effort to follow the logical trains to their respective stations. But I just shrug and accept it, because I don't want to be bugged by it. Monks, ninjas, and psionics, on the other hand, just can't be ignored.X-Marks! said:If you can imagine a setting wherein magic pushes the conceptual definitions of a medieval setting -- or monks and ninjas for that matter pushing its physicalities