• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Psionics: Do you use 'em or did you lose 'em

Do you use psionics in your campaign

  • Psionics: Love 'em! Use as both DM and Player.

    Votes: 162 52.4%
  • Psionics: Like 'em! Use as DM not player.

    Votes: 31 10.0%
  • Psionics: Like 'em! Use as Player not DM.

    Votes: 12 3.9%
  • Psionics: Dislike 'em! Only use if campaign demands (like Darksun).

    Votes: 44 14.2%
  • Psionics: Hate 'em! Never play them; ban them from my campaigns.

    Votes: 51 16.5%
  • Psionics: Isn't that the L. Ron. Hubbard book?

    Votes: 9 2.9%

Zander said:
Sorry, Mom. :o It just bugs me when anyone claims that psionics are fantasy.
As it bugs me when anyone claims that they're not. There's not a shred of scientific evidence to suggest that there's any reality to psychic powers, so by definition they are fantasy.

It proves absolutely nothing to point out that some sci-fi author in the 50s coined the term. I already knew that, but didn't bring it up because it was irrelevent.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


twofalls said:

Ditto the Ditto.

But, I have to add, in every campaign that I've used them so far, I've tweaked and/or banned some powers to restore game balance. But, since I do this with spells too, I guess the system isn't inherently flawed ;).
 

Joshua Dyal said:
As it bugs me when anyone claims that they're not. There's not a shred of scientific evidence to suggest that there's any reality to psychic powers, so by definition they are fantasy.

It proves absolutely nothing to point out that some sci-fi author in the 50s coined the term. I already knew that, but didn't bring it up because it was irrelevent.

Quoted for truth.
 


Joshua Dyal said:
Psionics is a completely fantastic notion. It doesn't belong in Sci-Fi because there's no scientific basis for psychic powers. "Psionics" is fantasy be default.

There is no scientific basis for warp drive, replicators, levitating cities, or aliens whose only distinguishing trait from humans is a forehead wrinkle, but all those things can be found in the science-fiction genre, hence the word "fiction."
 

Brennin Magalus said:
There is no scientific basis for warp drive, replicators, levitating cities, or aliens whose only distinguishing trait from humans is a forehead wrinkle

Hobgoblins? ;)
 

There is no scientific basis for warp drive, replicators, levitating cities, or aliens whose only distinguishing trait from humans is a forehead wrinkle, but all those things can be found in the science-fiction genre, hence the word "fiction."

Well, except for the forehead thing...I'm forced to disagree...In D&D they have pointy ears.

Replicators rearrange energy and matter into desired patterns- which is what happens in biological, chemical and nuclear reactions. Its not a question of could this be done, but HOW it could be done in a controlled fashion. According to the big brains out there, energy and matter are interchangeable-its a question of changing states.

Warp drive/hyperspace etc., in some form of another has been theorized not only by sci-fi guys, but also by serious theoriticians. Usually theories about warp drive (and its close buddies teleportation and time travel) involve hypermassive bodies like black holes or neutron stars...but others have described it as a possibility with string theory.

Reality? No...at least not yet. But possible according to some serious thinkers.

Compare that to terrestrial giant fire breathing reptillians: Never have existed- never will. And while there are some truly exotic animals out there, we have never found anything out there as exotic as the majority of the inhabitants of the MM's, Fiend Folio, etc.

That "not yet" as compared to "never have never will" is crucial. Its not a bright line test- after all much of the tech we use today would be considered impossible to someone 200 years ago- but it still points at a qualitative difference.

On the other hand, as Arthur C. Clark said: "Any significantly advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Many authors like Larry Niven, Heinlen, Moorcock etc. have played with that perception.

Add to that the recent move by WoTC to make Illithids into invaders from the future....

With that in mind, I really can't rule out psionics/psychic abilities as somehow "inappropriate" to a fantasy setting.
 

Brennin Magalus said:
There is no scientific basis for warp drive, replicators, levitating cities, or aliens whose only distinguishing trait from humans is a forehead wrinkle, but all those things can be found in the science-fiction genre, hence the word "fiction."
Actually, there most certainly is a scientific basis for all of the above, at least according to some theories, even if implausible or beyond our ability to accomplish currently.

So yeah, there is a big difference between psychic powers, which are fantasy, and all of the above, which are science fiction.
 

Dannyalcatraz said:
Add to that the recent move by WoTC to make Illithids into invaders from the future....

With that in mind, I really can't rule out psionics/psychic abilities as somehow "inappropriate" to a fantasy setting.
Where was this? I definatly missed this one. More info PLEASE.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top