• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Quick ASOIAF A Clash of Kings question (SPOILER)

Lord Pendragon said:
I merely disagree with your assertion that Tyrion has little cause to be redeemed. At this point in his life, he's done some truly atrocious things. To ignore that is to deny the character a large part of his complexity.

I don't disagree that he has some redeeming to do, it is just significanly less than many other characters. I was trying, albiet poorly, to state that he has a long history of good intentions. From visiting The Wall and helping them, to designing a special saddle for Bran, to finding ways to help the people of Kingsport while sitting as the Hand, he is one of the few characters who has really stepped up for others. Heck, in these books, even when Tyrion ordered his soldiers not to rape people it is almost heroic. He is desperate for recognition from his father, and is always aware of the balance of power within his family, but it is not until after the battle of Kingsport, the return of is father and the total lack of repect from his father for the job Tyrion did as the hand that Tyrion cracks. And what a crack it was, like you said it will take much more than a few Hail Marys to make up for the mess he created. It is the thread of the book I am most interested in picking back up.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

KnowTheToe said:
but it is not until after the battle of Kingsport, the return of is father and the total lack of repect from his father for the job Tyrion did as the hand that Tyrion cracks.
Are you purposefully ignoring the Tysha Incident?
 


Wasn't Tysha's demise the work of his his father? I thought it was his father that had every guardsman sleep with Tysha and then had Tyrion sleep with her one more time. I honesty can't remember what happened to her after that. Did Tyrion kill her?

I would also agree that this happens years before the current story and the incident has had serious impact on who Tyrion has become, but I do not feel any emotional attachment to any of those acts as they are memories of a character when he was 13.
 

IIRC Tyrion was told by his father that Tysha was a whore paid to sleep with him. I don't think his actions, or lack of them at that point would be considered monstrous. Remember, a 13 year old boy, against Tywin Lannister?
 

Taren Seeker said:
IIRC Tyrion was told by his father that Tysha was a whore paid to sleep with him. I don't think his actions, or lack of them at that point would be considered monstrous. Remember, a 13 year old boy, against Tywin Lannister?
A boy who raped the woman he loved after an entire garrison of soldiers had done the same.

I'm sorry guys. I love Tyrion a lot. He's one of my favorite characters. But you can only excuse him so much. Eventually you have to say to yourself, "okay, he did some really awful things. Now let's see what else he accompishes."

You could make an argument that years of abuse are what led Tyrion to [spoiler, highlight to read]
slaughtering his father and former lover
but at the end of the day, he still commited the act.

What Tyrion's done in his life may be understandable, but it's not excusable. This is not to say he's an evil villain. He's a very complex character. But he definitely has a very dark side.
 

One of my favorite parts of the series now is the Lannister brothers switching directions. Jaime seems to have seen the mess he has made of his life and is trying to redeem himself. Tyrion seems to be on a darker path now. It's a very cool direction and I can't wait to see where both of them end up.

Starman
 

I think one of my main problems with Tyrion is how blind and unclever he is with his father. I mean, the first time they mention his wife being "paid" to act that way, I wondered why he trusted his lying father. He also seemed to lose all wit when his father was there and make an idiot of himself. Would have been okay if they'd mentioned he was faltering in his fathers presence, but as is, there are too many things he should have said and didn't.

Greyjoy was never a useful character to me though. Same circumstances, his family is treating him like garbage, and he doesn't say the most obvious thing. "You wouldn't understand, having been raised by Stark!" "yes, raised by Starks because of your total failure!"
Every time they accused Theon of being some how less, it was completely ignored how it was completely THEIR fault. They lost him, and never tried to recover him.
And again, if it had been presented as them blinding themselves to this, perhaps I'd still care to read, but it's not. It's just passed over for no reason.

That and the fact that ever Catelyn chapter made me want to stop reading, are most of the reason I won't be reading the newer books.
The other reason being the timespan of if they ever come out. :)
 

Vocenoctum said:
I think one of my main problems with Tyrion is how blind and unclever he is with his father. I mean, the first time they mention his wife being "paid" to act that way, I wondered why he trusted his lying father.
What other time has Tywin ever lied to Tyrion? As far as Tyrion knew for the longest time, he didn't lie to him then, either. Tyrion has plenty of reason to trust his father, because as far as he knows, Tywin is honest with him. Respectful? No. Loving? No. Supportive? Heck, no. But Tywin is not a particularly dishonest individual, when it's not a political move.
He also seemed to lose all wit when his father was there and make an idiot of himself. Would have been okay if they'd mentioned he was faltering in his fathers presence, but as is, there are too many things he should have said and didn't.
Personally, I feel like I'm an entirely different person when in the presence of my parents than when I'm away from them. It seems perfectly reasonable to me that Tyrion only truly blossoms when he's on his own. It doesn't need to be said. GRRM's shown us, via all of Tyrion's scenes with and without Tywin.
Greyjoy was never a useful character to me though. Same circumstances, his family is treating him like garbage, and he doesn't say the most obvious thing. "You wouldn't understand, having been raised by Stark!" "yes, raised by Starks because of your total failure!"
Every time they accused Theon of being some how less, it was completely ignored how it was completely THEIR fault. They lost him, and never tried to recover him.
And again, if it had been presented as them blinding themselves to this, perhaps I'd still care to read, but it's not. It's just passed over for no reason.
They didn't "lose" him, he was taken from them by force. And how exactly could they try to get him back? Up until Robert bites it, Balon is in the same situation he was at the end of the war, completely outmanned by the rest of the Seven Kingdoms. Had he tried to get Theon back, he'd merely have been swatted down again, like he was the first time he tried to rebel.

As far as "things that should be said," you seem to expect character to say and do things as if they were in a vacuum. It's easy for us, outside of Theon's psyche, to come up with biting comments he could say to his family and the fortitude to say them, but it's a different matter to expect Theon to say them.

Theon grew up without parents. He was not raised by Ned Stark. He was boarded by Ned Stark. Ned did not discipline him or love him or try to educate him, as he did with his trueborn children and Jon. Ned left Theon to his own devices.

So Theon develops a complex. On the one hand, Ned is the strong male figure in his life, so subconsciously a part of him tries to emulate him, and respects him as a father-figure. On the other hand, Ned does not love him, and Theon craves a father's love. So he also dreams of his family back on Pike. He dreams he has a place there. That his father is just waiting for him to get back to take up that place at his side. He dreams of his father loving him.

All the while, he grows up to be a prick, because nobody is guiding him. Nobody is helping shape him into a decent human being. He learns to take what he wants, when he wants it. He learns not to care about others, especially women (there is no mother figure in Theon's life either,) who become merely products to be used and then disposed of.

So then he actually manages to get back to Pyke, and now his fantasy comes into harsh contact with reality. He's a prick, which alienates him from those who might have warmed to him, such as his sister and uncle. And his unconcious emulation of Stark annoys his father. A father which, only adding to Theon's anger, does not seem to love him at all. Nor is there a place for him at Pyke, waiting for him to take it up. His sister's been given his place (a woman?) and his father doesn't seem keen on creating a new one for him.

What does that leave Theon? Not much. In the end, it leads him to latch onto Winterfell like a stubborn child. Having been rejected by Balon and displaced by Asha, he turns back angrily to Ned. The man whose influence, in his mind, poisoned his father's love. The man who was responsible for his loss of position at Pyke. The man he, nevertheless, cannot help but respect. And he seeks to dominate Ned's memory, but dominating Ned's home, so he can dominate at least one part of his life, which has spun entirely out of his control.

No...as I see it Theon is a very believable, pitiable character. He's an a-hole, yes. But he did not choose to be. It's what was made of him.
That and the fact that ever Catelyn chapter made me want to stop reading, are most of the reason I won't be reading the newer books.
*shrug* A lot of people have problems with Cat's chapters. They aren't my favorite parts of his books, no, but I don't abhor them. They're no worse than Dany's "blood of the dragon" mantra, for me personally. :)
 

Lord Pendragon said:
What other time has Tywin ever lied to Tyrion? As far as Tyrion knew for the longest time, he didn't lie to him then, either. Tyrion has plenty of reason to trust his father, because as far as he knows, Tywin is honest with him. Respectful? No. Loving? No. Supportive? Heck, no. But Tywin is not a particularly dishonest individual, when it's not a political move.Personally, I feel like I'm an entirely different person when in the presence of my parents than when I'm away from them. It seems perfectly reasonable to me that Tyrion only truly blossoms when he's on his own. It doesn't need to be said. GRRM's shown us, via all of Tyrion's scenes with and without Tywin.
In the same way that I dislike some of the characters for what isn't there, you're assigning material to them that isn't present, IMO. Tyrion seemed to understand his fathers ruthless nature, and knew there was no love lost between them, but didn't think his father would deceive him? Just doesn't work for me, YMMV.



They didn't "lose" him, he was taken from them by force. And how exactly could they try to get him back? Up until Robert bites it, Balon is in the same situation he was at the end of the war, completely outmanned by the rest of the Seven Kingdoms. Had he tried to get Theon back, he'd merely have been swatted down again, like he was the first time he tried to rebel.
All exactly true, they "lost" him by losing the rebellion they started and he was taken as hostage. None of that is HIS fault though. His "failures" are not his own, but his fathers. I can understand if his father hates him for being the tangible example of his fathers failings, but from the material I've read, that's not why he hates him.

As far as "things that should be said," you seem to expect character to say and do things as if they were in a vacuum. It's easy for us, outside of Theon's psyche, to come up with biting comments he could say to his family and the fortitude to say them, but it's a different matter to expect Theon to say them.
I don't expect him to say everything I'm thinking, but I expect it to be addressed. If he can't face up to his father, that's acceptable but should be mentioned in some fashion.


<snip Theon stuff>
While all of that is possible, it's not in the actual material. Perhaps it's a part of Martin's style of writing that I dislike. We're seeing each chapter from a characters perspective, but without truely knowing the motivations for the character in most cases. I don't mind er.. NPC's from having hidden motives and such, but for the PC's to just act in a manner without any real depth (to my eyes) it turns the material tedious for me.

A lot of people have problems with Cat's chapters. They aren't my favorite parts of his books, no, but I don't abhor them. They're no worse than Dany's "blood of the dragon" mantra, for me personally. :)

If it's any consolation, Dany's chapters also became so tedious I could barely stand them. :)
My problem isn't just Catelyn, it just seems that ever chapter from her POV has something Stupid. (with a capital S!) It's like Martin made a conscious effort to put all the stupid stuff in her chapters, so it didn't bring down the other characters. :)

The other thing that irked me was the constant sexual references. Someone was always having sex, or being raped, or talking about one or the other in almost every chapter in Book 2 & 3. But that's just my tastes showing, so it's not a major thing.

I enjoyed the books, I didn't feel like throwing Book3 when I was done with it, but by the end, the tedious nature of it left me "done". I have no further interest in the setting, let alone waiting for years to get them. I will read spoilers and summaries though, just for a sense of completion. :)
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top