But I'd like to add another szenario as a question to those, who agreed to the second position:
Let's say, I am playing a rogue that hides behind a corner. He gets Sneak Attack, because of the fact that he has the hidden condition that grants him Advantage (Advantage is one of the requirements for a Sneak Attack). The Rogue is a master of hiding, so he attacks and then uses his Bonus Action to hide again with his Cunning Action. He repeats that for several rounds.
So, I know there are a lot of people that say "NO! You can't hide twice behind the same place!". But I assume three things:
What do you think about that?
- a) If there is a place to hide only the dice decides whether or not a creature detects the rogue (no matter how often).
- b) The creature might know from where the attack/arrow/bolt came from, but it does not see the attacker. It doesn't see the Rogue reloading or aiming and in case of an object (e.g. a big barrel) it doesn't even know, if the Rogue is going to pop out from the left or right side. So it's obviously harder to defend against the rogue's further attacks than it would normally be.
- c) The rogue (and only the rogue) can "shoot and hide" within one round. He is a master of hiding like other classes can cast or do other cool stuff. That said, there should be some "general openness" for rogue tactics, as it is one of his main features.
When trying to hide again, the rogue must make another Stealth check - if hiding in the same spot, you could choose to rule that the check is made with disadvantage as the monster has an inkling that someone is hiding there. (I think that's what I would do). Pick a different spot to hide and no disadv.
Of course, the monster may also take their action to attempt to get into cover. So, when your rogue pops back out to take a second shot, there is no target!!