Rate The Watchmen movie

Rate The Watchmen movie

  • 0 (lowest)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • 3

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 2 1.9%
  • 6

    Votes: 4 3.8%
  • 7

    Votes: 23 21.7%
  • 8

    Votes: 32 30.2%
  • 9

    Votes: 33 31.1%
  • 10 (highest)

    Votes: 10 9.4%

I'm pretty much just going to parrot the other posts here. I thought the beginning was a little slow, though I really liked the opening montage and I thought the song choice there was perfect (unlike in other portions of the movie). I was perfectly fine with the ending and I thought it worked better than the graphic novel version would have in a movie (works in the comic though).
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I'm pretty much just going to parrot the other posts here. I thought the beginning was a little slow, though I really liked the opening montage and I thought the song choice there was perfect (unlike in other portions of the movie). I was perfectly fine with the ending and I thought it worked better than the graphic novel version would have in a movie (works in the comic though).
The entire film felt slow compared to a lot of other films - but I have to say I enjoyed that. It was paced differently from an action film, something that fits the theme and tone of the film (note: I deliberately avoided reading the comic before the film).

It struck me as a "style-over-substance" film, but not in a bad way. It has lots of strong, impressive pictures and fitting music - sometimes it felt more like an "artsy" film than a big comic adaption, but then, I like a strong sense of cohesive style in films.

However, the characters were... slightly flat. While the film left an impression of gravitas, the characters did not. Rorschach was great and the portrayal of Dr. Manhattan also stood out - somewhat, because he did felt *alien* on occasion. The rest... was not uninteresting, but not particularly gripping either.

Furthermore, the film felt like it came too late. I think the themes of the film would have made more impact a when the nuclear threat was more pervasive - or even before the release of Dark Knight, which did the "realistic superhero" theme already- and better, character-wise.

Nevertheless, the positive aspects outweigh the negative ones by far, hence I think it's a solid 8. It probably could have been better, but not a lot, given the length constraints - because it does feel a bit rushed towards the end, suggesting that it had to cut a lot from the comic.

Cheers, LT.
 

If it had come out before Dark Knight, it would have had more impact. Rorschach's portrayal was great, and he kinda gives Ledger's Joker a run for his money.

I eagerly await the DVD with the extra features.
 

I'm kinda surprised to be saying this, but I loved it I loved it I loved it (that's a quote from the film critic David Edelstein, BTW, from his review of Sin City).

re: Dark Knight vs. Watchmen... thematically they're fairly different. In The Dark Knight, being a superhero is a bad idea, in Watchmen it's a tremendously bad idea, for everyone.
 
Last edited:


I have never read the comic so I am basing my opinion on the film alone. I thought the film looked great and it did well not feeling like 2 hours and 40 minutes.

The casting of the main characters was great, but this barely makes up for the spectacularly bad casting of real life politicians and newspeople. I would have prefered made up newspeople and just about anyone else as Nixon. I cringed every time I saw these people.

One review I saw complained about the music overwhelming the film, and I have to agree. Less would have been more in this case and a little less volume at times would have been good as well. At least none of the music sucked and they were willing to pay major royalties for big songs.

My biggest complaint however was dated feel of the movie. I fully understand that this is based on a 20 year old story, but the literal adaptation of it just doesn't work in this time frame.

Overall I gave it a 7/10 based on cinematography and acting by (most of) the main characters. This is pretty good for me as I rate on a bell curve with 5 being average and maybe 1 movie every year or two managing a 9+.
 

I gave it a 6.

On the whole, it was a pretty faithful adaptation of the comic as I remember it, and the changes made generally made sense, though with some rather glaring oversights.

On the other hand, it reminded me that I did not actually like the comic.

Brad
 

I think my biggest disappointment was how many people in the theater didn't "get" the point of the movie... We went to see it last night, and our theater was filled with people who were laughing and cheering during all the most inappropriate parts of the movie.
 

I suspect that much as well, after the showing, I heard comments blurted out, like "I hate this film', "I was so disappointed'...like that.

But my mental question to them was, 'Why did you stay for the entire run then?'

I gave a 8 our of 10.

Got flashbacks, on the comic panels, as I watched the movie.

As everyone knows, it is very, very, very hard...to give a true translatation from written material,and puttin it on the silverscreen.

I will see this film agian.
 

I think my biggest disappointment was how many people in the theater didn't "get" the point of the movie... We went to see it last night, and our theater was filled with people who were laughing and cheering during all the most inappropriate parts of the movie.

Yes, we had some guys that laughed at all the wrong times (seriously- during a
rape scene
? Are you sick or just inable to cope with a mature theme?).
 

Remove ads

Top