Remnants of the Horde:Back to Myrach...

Uriel said:
Sure Striking treats the weapon as +5 for purposes of Damage Reduction.

In 3.5, aren't +1 and +5 weapons equivalent for DR purposes? ie they're all "magical"? Or are we considering it as effectively bypassing all DR, for the purposes of this game?

Whatever the answer, Bane makes 'em cool enough in the first place :) Gotta love the Bane :)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Capellan said:
In 3.5, aren't +1 and +5 weapons equivalent for DR purposes? ie they're all "magical"? Or are we considering it as effectively bypassing all DR, for the purposes of this game?

Whatever the answer, Bane makes 'em cool enough in the first place :) Gotta love the Bane :)
Hmm...Sure Striking seems t have been negated then, or rather the need for it.

Let's call them +1 Seeking,Bane arrows, so they negate Concealment negs
How's that sound?


On a different note: I can't help but laugh every time I see Bargo's (big rusty) mental cogs going round, thinking about how much he hates Durgo, or beng sad that Durgo hadn't died yet.
 

Heh. :) You promised him someone would die in the hag's lair. He was so hopeful that hateful, abusive, annoyingly powerful, infuriatingly still alive ogre would be the one to bite it! :D
 



Jeremy said:
What do you want to do about everyone elses's sure striking enchantments?

Well, I was thinking a Bane, actually...

I'm going with
Bane:Giants for Bargo
and
Bane:Evil Outsiders for Durgo.
 





Remove ads

Top