Resurection book question

[Ruined]

Wow, thanks for popping in the thread, Kemp. For what it's worth, don't sweat Shemeska's issues too much. As you can probably tell, he's clearly biased towards all things fiendish.

 

[PaulKemp]

Wow, thanks for popping in the thread, Kemp. For what it's worth, don't sweat Shemeska's issues too much. As you can probably tell, he's clearly biased towards all things fiendish.

Ruined,

No worries. I don't sweat the issues, but since I'm around when the praise is flying, I figure I might as well be around when the criticism is flying too. Part of the job.

 

[Shemeska]

Anyway, for those readers for whom this issue is a bother, my apologies. As I say, it is not a material issue in the book and I don't think it takes anything away from the story. Still, I can imagine it is annoying.

It was a damn good book and that was the only thing I took issue with, the fiends. My love is tough Paul, so to speak. I just use the fiends a lot in my own writing and campaign and so it stuck out to me, and I'm rather particular with how they get portrayed like Ruined said.

That said, I'm eagerly looking forward to the third book in the Cale trilogy.

 

[PaulKemp]

It was a damn good book and that was the only thing I took issue with, the fiends. My love is tough Paul, so to speak. I just use the fiends a lot in my own writing and campaign and so it stuck out to me, and I'm rather particular with how they get portrayed like Ruined said.

That said, I'm eagerly looking forward to the third book in the Cale trilogy.

Thank you, Shemmy. I'm pleased that you enjoyed the novel, notwithstanding what I will henceforth euphemistically refer to as "the fiend issue."

Anyway, back to lurker mode.