Reviewing the older versions of D&D

[Deuce Traveler]

Well, Total Bullgrit (linked as a sig at the bottom of all my posts) is my personal Web site---it has some D&D stuff there, including this review. But it is not the link I was giving or pointing to, and it still takes you to the same place it always has (not the review).

I don't understand where all this confusion is coming from. I mean, I've gone back through this thread and clicked on each of the links I've given, and I get right to exactly where my post says the link goes. Sorry for causing so much confusion.

Bullgrit

Total Bullgrit

I agree. Bullgrit and I took our time to write these reviews, so it would be better if people critiqued our format and content rather than our initial posts. If this is not a worthy experiment, that would also be a stronger critique and people should say so if that is their opinion.

 

[Deuce Traveler]

I posted a review as well.
http://www.enworld.org/reviews.php?&do=product&productid=202075

Thanks! I enjoyed your review also.

 

[Deuce Traveler]

Okay, while it's great to see people review older material you all don't have to review the exact same module!!

I rather liked the idea of having several points of view.

 

[Bullgrit]

I just added two new classic module reviews.

T1 - The Village of Hommlet
http://www.enworld.org/reviews.php?do=review&reviewid=3669347

B2 - The Keep on the Borderlands
http://www.enworld.org/reviews.php?do=review&reviewid=3669353

They may not have actually posted for general viewing yet. I can see them, but you may not be able to yet. Check again later if you don't see them.

Bullgrit

Total Bullgrit

 

[Deuce Traveler]

I see them just fine. Good work.

 

[Bullgrit]

As soon as U1 gets added to the review database, I'll post my review of The Sinister Secret of Saltmarsh

Bullgrit

Total Bullgrit

 

[Bullgrit]

My review of U1 - Sinister Secret of Saltmarsh:

http://www.enworld.org/reviews.php?do=review&reviewid=3685688

(It may not be showing up yet; if it's not, check back later.)

Bullgrit

Total Bullgrit

 

[MerricB]

Okay, while it's great to see people review older material you all don't have to review the exact same module!!

Yes, you do. There is only one true module. All others are inferior copies of the true thing.

(Or something like that!)

Cheers!

 

[Bullgrit]

I've reviewed two more classic adventures:

A1 Slave Pits of the Undercity
I1 Dwellers of the Forbidden City

But since the ENWorld reviews system is not working, you can read the reviews at my own site:

http://www.totalbullgrit.com/dndreviews.html

Bullgrit
Total Bullgrit

 

[Fifth Element]

I think it's really the BEST DMG ever done. And maybe the BEST rpg product EVER. It's sooo complete. So useful! You can used it actively during play. You consult it constantly out of play to build and administer your campaing. It's got everything covered and more.

Can't say that I agree. While I appreciate the completeness, I also remember the terrible organization and ridiculously verbose writing. Using it during play is a crapshoot, again due to the terrible organization and tiny typeface.