The property on a Ring of Sympathy is as follows:
Once per round, when you save, one ally within 5 squares of you who is also wearing a ring of sympathy can make a saving throw.
The DM and players disagreed on the interpretation, particularly the phrase - when you save. I'm looking for help.
One camp, the DM believes the phrase, when you save, means a successful saving throw.
The other camp, the players, believe that just making a save is sufficient.
The DMs concern is that viewing it from the players point of view, the original owner of the ring makes a save (say at end of turn), which then gives the other rings owner a save which then triggers the original ring wearer to get another save. It is limited in that it is only once a round but getting 2 saves (end of turn save, and then retriggering the other ring owners property) in immediate succession doesn't seem quite right. Is that the intent of this ring?
This is so badly worded that it could be taken either way.
Help!
Once per round, when you save, one ally within 5 squares of you who is also wearing a ring of sympathy can make a saving throw.
The DM and players disagreed on the interpretation, particularly the phrase - when you save. I'm looking for help.
One camp, the DM believes the phrase, when you save, means a successful saving throw.
The other camp, the players, believe that just making a save is sufficient.
The DMs concern is that viewing it from the players point of view, the original owner of the ring makes a save (say at end of turn), which then gives the other rings owner a save which then triggers the original ring wearer to get another save. It is limited in that it is only once a round but getting 2 saves (end of turn save, and then retriggering the other ring owners property) in immediate succession doesn't seem quite right. Is that the intent of this ring?
This is so badly worded that it could be taken either way.
Help!