Roll for Combat reveals the terms of the "sweetheart deal" offered to 3pp

Parmandur

Book-Friend
I don't believe that at all. They have those numbers at their fingertips. They are as likely to be out of touch about those numbers as they are about what players and DMs want out of the game. There's no way in hell that they haven't had long talks with some people who make those products or have employees who have done it themselves.
Why do you thinknthat WotC financial people have access to Kobold Press or Goodman Games finances? Working under the assumption that past $750,000 a company is operating pure profit for a book might seem to be very reasonable from the data that WotC has access to or general MBA trained assumptions, because that MBA wouldn't set up a business that wasn't operating in profit by that point...and the marketing WotC had on offer as detailed in this thread is probably worth more than they were asking at 25% over $750,000. But might be a threat to a company operating on the cliff's edge that an MBA wouldn't factor into their assumptions.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Parmandur

Book-Friend
Wait… I’m confused… is it 25% of revenue OVER 750K or is it 25% of ALL revenue once you go over 750K? @_@
15% of all revenue past $750,000. So if a company had signed one of these deals and made $750,001, they would owe WotC 15 cents while getting all the noted advertising help. But each dollar they make past that point is $0.15 to WotC...which given the marketing indifference isn't crazy.
 

"Kids today. They don't know they've been born."


Using English claims it is international usage. However, Google Ngrams suggests it is primarily British English. Earliest written record seems to be about 100 years ago. To me, it feels like its more Midlands/Northern British than southern.

Most reference websites seem to suggest it means something along the lines of "you have a good life and don't realise it". It's something like "Oh my sweet summer child" in that regard, except a bit more disparaging, because it's normally used to refer to someone in the third person, rather than talking to someone in the second person.
Sort of like "bless your heart" in the southern United States.
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
Why do you thinknthat WotC financial people have access to Kobold Press or Goodman Games finances? Working under the assumption that past $750,000 a company is operating pure profit for a book might seem to be very reasonable from the data that WotC has access to or general MBA trained assumptions, because that MBA wouldn't set up a business that wasn't operating in profit by that point...and the marketing WotC had on offer as detailed in this thread is probably worth more than they were asking at 25% over $750,000. But might be a threat to a company operating on the cliff's edge that an MBA wouldn't factor into their assumptions.
They don't need exact finances of any specific company to know a very close approximation to what the profit margins are as a whole for 3PP. They knew what 20-25% would do. Hell, even after people screamed about what those margins were, they still only lowered it to a 3PP killing 15% for the "sweetheart" deal.
 


Parmandur

Book-Friend
They don't need exact finances of any specific company to know a very close approximation to what the profit margins are as a whole for 3PP. They knew what 20-25% would do. Hell, even after people screamed about what those margins were, they still only lowered it to a 3PP killing 15% for the "sweetheart" deal.
The 15% offer came before the leaks, incidentally, that was their opening gambit to have 25% the standard withb15% for negotiated contracts.

I thinknyou overestimate the potential knowledge of the MBA making the number calls here. They aren't the people who know people at Kobold Press, and knowing several people whose job it is to male these sorts of number proposals I have been told it is "wild ass guessing." I think the most likely explanation is that the business side people really believed that 25% with marketing assistance was a legitimately great offer on the numbers.

Even assuming more knowledge than I am guessing the business guys had, let's take a look at Kobold Press Tome of Beasts line. They had fewer than 10,000 backers for the latest one on Kickstarter, and made some thousands of sales on DriveThruRPG. Now, let's assume that WotC marketing offer convinced 1% of D&D Beyond users to try Tome of Beasts V, or about 150,000 sales: or approximately $7.5 Million in revenue. Sure, 15% on 7.5 million would be a lot of money given to WotC, but from a business point of view that's a fair trade.
 
Last edited:


HomegrownHydra

Adventurer
I think the reason it didn't work was that the people at WotC in charge of figuring out a number didn't have an accurate understanding of how seat-of-the-pants the third party D&D industry is.
Kickstarter straight up told WotC that these sky high royalties were too much for creators to be able afford. WotC knew that and went forward with them precisely because they were trying to hamstring the top 3pp's not because they thought the royalty rate was reasonable.
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
The 15% offer came before the leaks, incidentally, that was their opening gambit to have 25% the standard withb15% for negotiated contracts.

I thinknyou overestimate the potential knowledge of the MBA making the number calls here. They aren't the people who know people at Kobold Press, and knowing several people whose job it is to male these sorts of number proposals I have been told it is "wild ass guessing." I think the most likely explanation is that the business side people really believed that 25% with marketing assistance was a legitimately great offer on the numbers.

Even assuming more knowledge than I am guessing the beers guys had, let's take a look at Kobold Press Tome of Beasts line. They had fewer than 10,000 backers for the latest one on Kickstarter, and made some thousands of sales on DriveThruRPG. Now, let's assume that WotC marketing offer convinced 1% of D&D Beyond users to try Tome of Beasts V, or about 150,000 sales: or approximately $7.5 Million in revenue. Sure, 15% on 7.5 million would be a lot of money given to WotC, but from a business point of view that's a fair trade.
You give a repeatedly and blatantly deceptive company more credit than I do.
 

Parmandur

Book-Friend
Kickstarter straight up told WotC that these sky high royalties were too much for creators to be able afford. WotC knew that and went forward with them precisely because they were trying to hamstring the top 3pp's not because they thought the royalty rate was reasonable.
A lot of assumptions going on there. The Occam's Razor approach is that the decision makers at WotC thought this was a good deal that people would take up, and everybody would make money. And putting on the McBusiness glasses, I can see why that may have seemed reasonable from a particular information vantage point.
 

Remove ads

Top