RPG Evolution: The Phantom Party

I run a weekly D&D game at my local library. Every week, up to 30% of registered players don't show up.
timajo-library-1599992_1920.jpg

Picture courtesy of Pixabay.

Running any free event at a public library is an act of local heroism; running a weekly Dungeons & Dragons game comes with a unique set of logistical nightmares. Unlike a private home game or a paid professional session, a free library program exists in a realm of low accountability. When there is no financial barrier to entry, the registration becomes a placeholder rather than a promise.

This lack of skin in the game transforms the RSVP into a non-binding intention, leading to a phenomenon where players treat the session as an optional backup plan for their weekend. As a result, I've often been left playing a high-stakes roulette with the attendance numbers, trying to balance the physical limits of the table against a no-show rate that can fluctuate wildly based on nothing more than a change in the weather or a sudden whim.

The Paradox of the "Soft Yes"​

Why do people go through the trouble of registering for a game they never show up to? That psychological hurdle is the primary driver of the empty chair syndrome. In the world of community programming, studies suggest that a no-show rate of forty to sixty percent is not just common—it's the baseline. Without a ticket price to act as a commitment anchor, participants often don't feel a sense of personal obligation to the host or the other players.

This creates a culture of the last-minute cancellation, where players wait until the eleventh hour to decide if they are actually going to attend. Worse, though our system has a waitlist, it requires registrants ahead of them to cancel first. Because they didn't pay to be there, they don't see their absence as a loss of value, failing to realize that their late withdrawal prevents someone on the waitlist from ever getting the chance to play. This friction is exacerbated by the fact that many adults don't finalize their social calendars until the weekend is already upon them, leaving the registration system in a state of constant, unstable flux.

The Art of the Tactical Oversubscription​

To combat this systemic unreliability, I've learn to embrace the art of oversubscription. My table can only realistically support seven players, but I've opened the registration to ten or twelve. It might feel like a recipe for chaos, but it's often the only way to ensure a full house.

By targeting a registration count that is fifty percent higher than actual capacity, we're essentially building a human buffer against the inevitable no-shows. This strategy relies on a robust waitlist system that triggers automated reminders forty-eight and twenty-four hours before the dice hit the table. However, the real secret weapon is the personalized touch.

A direct message or a community-wide shout-out a few hours before the session creates a sense of immediate, social expectation that an automated email simply cannot replicate. It moves the event from a line item on a calendar to a shared social appointment, making it much harder for a player to justify a silent disappearance. I created a Discord channel for this purpose, and it works well for players who have attended at least one game.

Forging a Diehard Community​

The most effective long-term solution to the attendance crisis isn't better software, but a dedicated community. By moving regular players into a centralized space like a Discord server and Facebook group, we shifted the dynamic from a nameless library registration to a bonded group of friends. These diehards develop a sense of ownership over the game world, and their accountability moves from the institution to the person sitting behind the screen.

Not surprisingly, when a player feels that their absence will actively diminish the experience for their companions, the no-show rate plummets. Implementing a clear policy—such as moving habitual no-shows to the bottom of the waitlist—further reinforces that while the game is free to attend, the seat itself has a high value. Over time, this transforms the table from a revolving door of curious strangers into a reliable vanguard of heroes who understand that their presence is important. It also communicates to new players that this is a game worth investing in.

Accessibility vs. Stability​

In the end, the blessing and a curse of the free game is something every community-focused event must reconcile. The accessibility of a library program is what allows new blood to enter the hobby and keeps my campaign world growing, but that accessibility comes at a price. By using tactical oversubscription and fostering a culture of mutual respect through community building, you can ensure that the table remains full and the adventure continues.

Of course, there's always the chance EVERYONE shows up. I'll discuss how I handle that in a future article.

Your Turn: How do you manage your no shows?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Michael Tresca

Michael Tresca

I've never run a public game but I did run a jazz jam for a while. Amateur jazzers are just as nerdy as D&D players and they're even flakier and difficult to deal with. I had big problems with no shows, people who'd show for an hour and then leave, etc. No shows in that context were a real problem because you had to "make the band"... you needed a rhythm section and couldn't just have a "band" with three keyboard players and four guitarists. The same issue would show up in D&D if you're hoping to get a balanced party. I actually learned to play another instrument so that if the person who wanted to show for it didn't! I decided to bail before I started implementing things like pre-payment and a ban list for frequent no shows. I was at the point of either needing to do that or quit and I chose the latter because I didn't want to go in the more professionalized direction.
 

Without a ticket price to act as a commitment anchor, participants often don't feel a sense of personal obligation to the host or the other players.
WTF!?!?

As I've mentioned elsewhere, this is a cultural thing/issue. This is not 'normal' across the globe.

Around here it would be pretty much anathema unless you have a pretty darned good reason, having to go suddenly to the hospital or something similar. We do have the occasional situation where someone can't make it on a particular day and we either move the session or cancel it altogether. When folks go on vacation, we know it well in advance and tend to play something else with the folks that are left. Our planning culture might be the other extreme, but folks treating it as a backup for when they don't have anything else to do and cancelling at the last minute is so disrespectful!

I don't run a public game though, but if I did, you can pull that once, but if you pull that again, you're out!
 

I used to organize game events for a living. it takes thick skin, patience, and a willingness to march onward week after week even when things look bleak. A calm, positive demeanor and consistency usually pays off in the end when eventually an event will reach critical mass. It's very rewarding when that happens because you know you soldiered on through some demoralizing weeks or months without giving up.
 


It sounds pretty typical for the UK. Indeed even if already paid in full it wouldn’t surprise me if one or two people didn’t show.
I would argue that UK culture is halfway between the European 'average' and the US, in some things more then in others. So that's not that unexpected to be honest.

But I wonder how this works in other parts of the world? Brazil, France, Ghana, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Japan, etc. A more diverse culture so to speak...
 

WTF!?!?

As I've mentioned elsewhere, this is a cultural thing/issue. This is not 'normal' across the globe.

Around here it would be pretty much anathema unless you have a pretty darned good reason, having to go suddenly to the hospital or something similar. We do have the occasional situation where someone can't make it on a particular day and we either move the session or cancel it altogether. When folks go on vacation, we know it well in advance and tend to play something else with the folks that are left. Our planning culture might be the other extreme, but folks treating it as a backup for when they don't have anything else to do and cancelling at the last minute is so disrespectful!

I don't run a public game though, but if I did, you can pull that once, but if you pull that again, you're out!


For public events, not events run by friends, this sounds quite typical. I have organized events in several european countries (in other nerd activities), and up to 50% no shows is not uncommon an average of 30% (and with that 50% overbooking) sounds reasonable.

Even if you write several remember emails and ask for confirmation. And these were events with limited number of seats, so people who registered confirmed and showed not up took the space of others, also the events were with food planning so this can also mean 100s of euros of food needs to be in the worst case thrown away.


The only event where this was better was one which was organized by a single university in a nordic country, where the participants lived on campus anyway and the official organization went over the university, so it felt more official and helped to bring up the participation rate up. But even there we had 25% of participants not showing up the the pre event (which allowed us to use the waiting list to backfill).
 
Last edited:

For public events, not events run by friends, this sounds quite typical. I have organized events in several european countries (in other nerd activities), and up to 50% no shows is not uncommon an average of 30% (and with that 50% overbooking) sounds reasonable.
I can see this happening for single events, but a recurring session with a running campaign is imho something different from a one-shot event.
 

When I left the Army and moved to the National Guard for the last couple years of my service, I found things to be a total culture shock. One of the things was that the Guard meets only once a month on the weekend and not everyday. The captain or lieutenant would tell us to call the soldiers to see if they were coming this weekend since we had training. I had a problem with this and set the expectation that grown soldiers would show up according to the schedule sent out each year and when they were told each month. There were still some people that could/would not show and tried to get make-up details during the week or something like going to a school visit instead of the training.

I think it came down to some people just suck. There might be different levels but it is all the same. The idea that my time is more important than your time and what you have planned. When it is free, there is no commitment like mentioned. It does seem like the only way is to make it a cost or screen out those that do not value your time.

I get that some people will want to try the game out and might not like it and wander away. The social media post seems like a great wat to encourage people to say when they are not making it.
 

I can see this happening for single events, but a recurring session with a running campaign is imho something different from a one-shot event.
Well but it does sound more like a weekly event with frop in and drop out, so not necessarily a normal campaign in that sense.
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Related Articles

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top