RPG Evolution: The Phantom Party

I run a weekly D&D game at my local library. Every week, up to 30% of registered players don't show up.
timajo-library-1599992_1920.jpg

Picture courtesy of Pixabay.

Running any free event at a public library is an act of local heroism; running a weekly Dungeons & Dragons game comes with a unique set of logistical nightmares. Unlike a private home game or a paid professional session, a free library program exists in a realm of low accountability. When there is no financial barrier to entry, the registration becomes a placeholder rather than a promise.

This lack of skin in the game transforms the RSVP into a non-binding intention, leading to a phenomenon where players treat the session as an optional backup plan for their weekend. As a result, I've often been left playing a high-stakes roulette with the attendance numbers, trying to balance the physical limits of the table against a no-show rate that can fluctuate wildly based on nothing more than a change in the weather or a sudden whim.

The Paradox of the "Soft Yes"​

Why do people go through the trouble of registering for a game they never show up to? That psychological hurdle is the primary driver of the empty chair syndrome. In the world of community programming, studies suggest that a no-show rate of forty to sixty percent is not just common—it's the baseline. Without a ticket price to act as a commitment anchor, participants often don't feel a sense of personal obligation to the host or the other players.

This creates a culture of the last-minute cancellation, where players wait until the eleventh hour to decide if they are actually going to attend. Worse, though our system has a waitlist, it requires registrants ahead of them to cancel first. Because they didn't pay to be there, they don't see their absence as a loss of value, failing to realize that their late withdrawal prevents someone on the waitlist from ever getting the chance to play. This friction is exacerbated by the fact that many adults don't finalize their social calendars until the weekend is already upon them, leaving the registration system in a state of constant, unstable flux.

The Art of the Tactical Oversubscription​

To combat this systemic unreliability, I've learn to embrace the art of oversubscription. My table can only realistically support seven players, but I've opened the registration to ten or twelve. It might feel like a recipe for chaos, but it's often the only way to ensure a full house.

By targeting a registration count that is fifty percent higher than actual capacity, we're essentially building a human buffer against the inevitable no-shows. This strategy relies on a robust waitlist system that triggers automated reminders forty-eight and twenty-four hours before the dice hit the table. However, the real secret weapon is the personalized touch.

A direct message or a community-wide shout-out a few hours before the session creates a sense of immediate, social expectation that an automated email simply cannot replicate. It moves the event from a line item on a calendar to a shared social appointment, making it much harder for a player to justify a silent disappearance. I created a Discord channel for this purpose, and it works well for players who have attended at least one game.

Forging a Diehard Community​

The most effective long-term solution to the attendance crisis isn't better software, but a dedicated community. By moving regular players into a centralized space like a Discord server and Facebook group, we shifted the dynamic from a nameless library registration to a bonded group of friends. These diehards develop a sense of ownership over the game world, and their accountability moves from the institution to the person sitting behind the screen.

Not surprisingly, when a player feels that their absence will actively diminish the experience for their companions, the no-show rate plummets. Implementing a clear policy—such as moving habitual no-shows to the bottom of the waitlist—further reinforces that while the game is free to attend, the seat itself has a high value. Over time, this transforms the table from a revolving door of curious strangers into a reliable vanguard of heroes who understand that their presence is important. It also communicates to new players that this is a game worth investing in.

Accessibility vs. Stability​

In the end, the blessing and a curse of the free game is something every community-focused event must reconcile. The accessibility of a library program is what allows new blood to enter the hobby and keeps my campaign world growing, but that accessibility comes at a price. By using tactical oversubscription and fostering a culture of mutual respect through community building, you can ensure that the table remains full and the adventure continues.

Of course, there's always the chance EVERYONE shows up. I'll discuss how I handle that in a future article.

Your Turn: How do you manage your no shows?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Michael Tresca

Michael Tresca

This type of weekly 'open' game might also be a good place to have more episodic games and 'West Marches' style of parties. A bit like Adventure League where the DM might not know what PCs are going to play and has a more generic adventure even if it is tied to a larger campaign. You still want to know that people are coming and if you need waiting list players.

In my golf league, there are two-man teams that are expected each week. We also have back up players that do not want to play each week but do not mind a couple time each month just to play. The team missing someone needs to call a back up to come otherwise you are competing by yourself and hurting your partner. Not quite the same in this situation though. I wanted to play more gold last year and just started to show up on Thursdays and most weeks they were looking for a last minute player for someone who last minute could not show.

Might be that there are one or two players that can show up and help DM or play if needed. It would be great if things grew enough that you needed to run two tables if more showed and could be just one table if less people showed. Not as fair to those that can come each week and not know if they can play or need to DM. There might be one or two that do not mind though.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

WTF!?!?

As I've mentioned elsewhere, this is a cultural thing/issue. This is not 'normal' across the globe.
It's a fascinating thing that's on the same spectrum of "Pay What You Want." It's why I get annoyed that PWYW is listed with "free" content on DTRPG. That simple fact (PWYW = on the spectrum of "free") shows a whole mindset around the "entitlement" of free. I have gotten much harsher reviews/criticism of free products than products people pay for. There's talk in some circles of "just charge a dollar to make people care" but that's not how libraries work.

I wish this wasn't the case. But working with a D&D weekly game in the library has taught me a lot about free events in general, and the librarian I work with has definitely reinforced that this is actually pretty common.
 

This type of weekly 'open' game might also be a good place to have more episodic games and 'West Marches' style of parties. A bit like Adventure League where the DM might not know what PCs are going to play and has a more generic adventure even if it is tied to a larger campaign. You still want to know that people are coming and if you need waiting list players.
That's how I run it, basically. It's a living world. People come and go. I adjust on the fly. There's not "hang out in the dungeon" and "oops Bob just disappeared or is on autopilot while we're still in the dungeon." It's very much "stuff happens in town, we go on adventure, we wrap it up by the time we get back" and if a PC doesn't show up it's more easily integrated into the world.

That said, it's still stressful when more people show up than expected or far less (like two players only when I expected at least four). we've had three near TPKs because of me adjusting down on the fly and...the dice pushing things from "iffy" to "everyone's doomed" with dice rolls. All because people can't manage their calendars or show up for events.

Conversely? Those players who DID show up had some of the most thrilling adventures we've ever played. So...
 

I have seen a variation of this at conventions. Players in early rounds of Game A will also schedule slots in later time slots in Game B in case they lose early in Game A. If they win early rounds in Game A, they are no shows for Game B. If you are running Game B, you quickly learn to deal with absences. Happens often with free games but even when there is a cost, no shows happen. At least at a convention, there are often a lot of interested folks that might be willing to sit in if you announce "Have 3 open slots for Game B in 15 minutes...". I imaging that yelling about open game table slots in a library might be poorly received.

Are you sending out recaps of each session to everyone? Possible that a no show reading about the game they missed out on might improve memory for the next session.
 


Thanks for the great topic @talien ! I like that you have tips for those playing the long game about how to slowly firm up a nebulous player base into a reliable group. Excited to see how you handle when 11 people DO suddenly show ( secret reserve DM? ).
 

In this age of Big Brother, I try to avoid social media like the plague (except maybe this site :D ).

That said, I have used text messaging to organize (home) games and usually ask for an attendance status an hour before the game starts. However, that only works when you already have group members and for our local FLGS where a game is being started up or new people drop in or out at a moment's notice, that doesn't work much at all. (Also, I'm extremely sensitive about giving my phone number out to anyone other than well-known friends/co-workers/relatives I don't hate).

My brother uses Discord to organize his games, and while I'm fine with firing it up actively at game time I keep it shut off at other times so it wouldn't be good for me to keep up with what's going on with others and whether they might miss or reschedule.
 

I sometimes run games or Learn to Play classes at my local library, and I can confirm.

Running with multiple DMs simultaneously, we're able to balance better. Going with more or fewer players per DM, depending on turnout.
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Related Articles

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top