Sell me on Arcana Evolved.

Dannyalcatraz said:
Actually, no.

Actually, yes. This may come as a shock to you, but there are posts in this thread other than yours. I realize you don't care about them and haven't been reading them, but it is nonetheless true.

BTW, I checked a friend's biology textbooks - biology being the study of living creatures in all forms - and found no inquiries into the nature of divinity. Thus, I'm quite comfortable excluding gods from that category, as I believe I'm not exactly in a minority in doing so. No amount of cherry-picking through internet dictionaries in order to play weird semantic games on your part is likely to change that, sorry.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Dannyalcatraz said:
Even if you rule the gods themselves are not subject to the akashic ability, there is also the problem of any known direct interaction between a god and any other non-divine being.

You channel the Imrahel, first prophet of The One, and ask him "did you really hear The One speaking to you, and write down what he said in the books of Ihon-Re?" His answer: "Yes, absolutely." You still don't know if he was truely channeling a deity, or being mislead by some other supernatural being, or a psychotic listening to the voices in his head.

Alternately, he could also give a non-answer such as "that you ask the question indicates you are not ready to hear the answer." I could see these sorts of answers classified as "problems", but probably not in the way you seem to think.
 

Actually, yes. This may come as a shock to you, but there are posts in this thread other than yours. I realize you don't care about them and haven't been reading them, but it is nonetheless true.

I've read every post in this thread. Each response I've made has been carefully considered before drafting. The one that prompted your above response was a direct response to Mr. SSquirrel's definition of "god."
 
Last edited:

Dannyalcatraz said:
Listen you snooty goofball- I've read every post in this thread. Each response I've made has been carefully considered before drafting. The one that prompted your above response was a direct response to Mr. SSquirrel. So kindly stuff yourself.

Your careful consideration apparently didn't include verifying who you were replying to, since your "direct response to Mr. SSquirrel" quoted my post. Kindly withdraw your personal attacks.
 

Dannyalcatraz said:
Listen you snooty goofball- I've read every post in this thread. Each response I've made has been carefully considered before drafting. The one that prompted your above response was a direct response to Mr. SSquirrel. So kindly stuff yourself.

Danny, it's a shame that if all the other posts had been carefully considered, you didn't consider the quoted post as carefully as the others - personal attacks are not allowed.

Would you please edit your comments, or else I'll have to ask you to leave this thread.

Thanks
 




Plane Sailing said:
Danny, it's a shame that if all the other posts had been carefully considered, you didn't consider the quoted post as carefully as the others - personal attacks are not allowed.

Would you please edit your comments, or else I'll have to ask you to leave this thread.

Thanks
Oh dear. Now even fantasy-religion became a hot and moderator-requiring topic. :\
 


Remove ads

Top