Umbran said:
Interesting. Can you name a few shows you don't think look "cheap"?
Keep in my mind, this is entirely in my opinion (or cheapness standard which may vary from others): Star Trek: TNG , newest Battlestar Galactica.
What's your opinion on the look of Firefly (and the Serenity movie)?
Umbran said:
Do you have some sort of information that Joss didn't allow the people with the Design, Decoration, and Cinematography credits do their jobs? From whence do you get the idea that Joss made those decisions?
Because he's the director.
Do I know how much input he had on the art direction? No I don't know...its mostly speculation. However, he is the director, the look of the project is also within his scope of responsibilities.
Whatever the case may be ...however it was handled, whether Joss was hands off or hands on....he is the director and has power over the art direction. Should he feel it isn't a certain quality, he can always say so and steer the team back to his vison. So , whatever happened during production, doesn't matter , the end result speaks for itself. Whether Joss had let the art team perform wihout his input or with lots of his input, in the end Joss still has the stamp of approval. Well, do be fair, the producers probably have their say too a bit, I'm sure.
Anyways, I don't normally like the visuals on a Joss project. But I do like the writing. And who knows what a new Serenity film may look like if it instead had a 100million budget rather that the reported 40 for the first one. Could be it still looks cheap becuase of Joss's leadership and tastes or....could be that you finally see his true vision of what he has in mind.....and that its actually pretty cool, just needed more money to do it right.