Ruin Explorer
Legend
I think the issue is that a Paladin with mount/lance stuff, but not Lay on Hands or something similar is alien to essentially the last 25 years of Paladins, where clearly LoH has been more definitively Paladin-esque. It's more extreme with a Barbarian, their defining characteristic in D&D-type games has always (or again, for at least 25 years) been Rage. If you're not using that, why use such a baggage-laden name as Barbarian, even? All you're doing is setting people up for disappointment and/or making people think "Huh, this game is different" - but that's not how other classes are designed - indeed the core Shadowdark classes are pretty much what you'd expect, trope-wise.The bold part is endemic, and drives me crazy. There's this assumption that a Paladin must, of course, have Lay on Hands. Or a Barbarian must, of course, have a rage mechanic. Etc.
I think there's a difference between "failing to pare down", and "removing/replacing defining tropes for no apparent reason". Those examples aren't "failing to pare down", certainly "Barbarians should have Rage" isn't.