FrogReaver
The most respectful and polite poster ever
Wrong. The rules are not being ignored. They are being extended based on a reasonable reading and interpretation of exosting rules and using personal judgement on how it might be reflected at a game table mechanically. Clearly the reading that has been proposed by myself and others is reasonable since multiple people have demonstrated that it is a fair interpretation of the rules, just as your interpretation has been judged by others to be reasonable and fair. However, the claim that a reading that is not in agreement to your reading, to use your own words, outlandish.
Besides, who are you to say any of us are wrong? Last I checked, you didn't design or build this system. You have no right to state what is right or wrong or fair or not. You can do that for your own table and play experience, but not assume so over other players or groups.
Words have meaning. Saying an improvised weapon that doesn’t resemble a weapon does 1d4 means exactly what it says. There’s no way around that. An apple seed doesn’t resemble a weapon and so will do 1d4 damage. Ruling otherwise is a house rule. I’m all for that house rule but let’s call things what thy are.