D&D 4E Should the Flumph be included in the 4E Monster Manual?

[Clavis]

All hail our Flumph masters!

 

[Moonshade]

The flumph in 4E: D&D Insider's April Fools preview?

 

[Evilhalfling]

: the floater...

thats just painful. great way to start a monday.
Flumphs should remain out of core, but strong presesnce in 3rd party releases.
monsters this silly, like the girillion, gnomes and topiary guardians should remain optioinal.

 

[Merlin the Tuna]

Ooh, maybe after bringing back the flumph, we can do something really clever, like make a Chuck Norris joke.

*Cough*

 

[Samuel Leming]

Flumphs should remain out of core, but strong presesnce in 3rd party releases.
monsters this silly, like the girillion, gnomes and topiary guardians should remain optioinal.

There’s a glaring omission from your list of silly monsters: the Halfling. They’re not any better then a gnome when you think about it…

Really, all monsters are optional. Including the flumph in the MM right from the start would give a DM a good additional choice for when a bit of comic relief or whimsy is needed.

Besides, a beholder is fairly silly too if you discount its eye attacks. If silly isn’t what you want, then give the flumph ten levels of psion. If you want to make the flumph sillier, give it ten levels of barbarian and a keg.

Sam

 

[Samuel Leming]

Ooh, maybe after bringing back the flumph, we can do something really clever, like make a Chuck Norris joke.

*Cough*

You could always conflate the two concepts... Still not clever, but it would have a good chance of being funny with the right DM.

Sam

 

[Stalker0]

monsters this silly....topiary guardians should remain optioinal.

Bah, plant statues that come to life is iconic fantasy, that should be core!!

 

[The_Gneech]

Flail snail!

FLAAAAAIIIIL SNAAAAAIIIILLL!!!

-The Gneech

PS: Flail snail.

 

[Clavis]

Flail snail!

FLAAAAAIIIIL SNAAAAAIIIILLL!!!

-The Gneech

PS: Flail snail.

Now this is getting exciting!

Let's talk Tirapheg...

 

[freyar]

Voted yes, because, really, why not?