Unless the background noise is originating from inside the spell's area of effect, it would still be heard. The only problem with using silence as a sneaking tool is that you can't get within 15' of any guards without tipping them off.HighlandsBear said:Cast on the party's scout so that he always succeeds on move silently.
I never thought this was a reasonable use of the spell. They should've made it like grease where you have a different effect when you cast it on the ground, on an item, or on a person. If you are walking around silencing everything within 15' of yourself you may technically be moving silently, but if there is normal background noise it seems to me like you would be much easier to detect than normal.
Altamont Ravenard said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but there was an extensive discussion, not so long ago, concerning the feasibility (sp?) of using Silence as a Counterspell, regarding the following situation:
Cleric readies to cast a Silence spell near the first enemy spellcaster who starts casting.
Enemy spellcaster starts to cast, and the area around him goes silent.
Does the enemy spellcaster:
a) lose the spell
b) fail to get the spell off without losing it
c) move out of the area and cast his spell
?
AR
Which has nothing to do with alerting guards while silenced.Scion said:It wouldnt matter, it kills all sound within its radius whether it originates within the radius or outside of it. So the person inside of it will hear nothing at all.