Morrus said:Just a quick note - I've been asked by RPGNow and by the thread originator to delete this thread. That's not going to happen (this is a news site!).
If the thread gets heated, it'll get closed, but the subject will not be banned as a discussion topic.
philreed said:Don't worry. From the discussions it is clear that exceptions are being made so that the high-quality publishers stay on RPGNow regardless of sales.
Crothian said:Isn't that going to be a bit insultive though? These people we feel are doing good work, so we let them stay, you other guys who frankly aren't dfoing good work we are going to move you to another site since you get in the way of the people who make us money.
Vigilance said:Or it could be viewed as a positive- as in "now you don't have to compete with Green Ronin or Wizards of the Coast for attention on the front page".
Really, people are getting unnecessarily upset about this move. The real potential winners in this scenario are those being moved to the indy site imo.
Vigilance said:Or it could be viewed as a positive- as in "now you don't have to compete with Green Ronin or Wizards of the Coast for attention on the front page".
Really, people are getting unnecessarily upset about this move. The real potential winners in this scenario are those being moved to the indy site imo.
Crothian said:But from what Phil Reed said that I quoted, quality publishers get to stay. So, it doesn't seem to matter what the sales were like just if whomever happens to think you do quality work. So, the main site is where all the people who do good work is, the other site is for the others.