D&D 5E So 5 Intelligence Huh

Hiya!

I have not read this entire thread...haven't read most of it, actually (76 pages!). My take on "low Int" (or Wisdom or even Charisma) is to treat it as I've always treated these things since my Basic Dungeons & Dragons days in '80:

The player can be as smart or as clever as he can or wants to be; outcome may be adjusted by me.

So a 5 Int character isn't smart. That's known. Can't count past 10, difficulty reading anything with more than 5 letters, can't remember names, places or events that happened too long ago (unless it was significant to the character), has trouble differentiating between silver, electrum an platinum coins, etc. That doens't mean the player can't say "Babs tries to lift up the door rather than push or pull it..." when presented with a door with no handle or visible hinges. Why? It's a role-playing game for people. The fun in playing the "puzzle" parts of the game are in using your own brain to solve riddles, tricks, and whatnot. If you remove that from a players hands...you just removed 1/3 or more of any campaign. Would you (general you) tell a player he couldn't engage in combat because he only had a 5 Str or Dex? Of course not.

Now, in my example, after Bab's players states she will try and life the door, I might say...: "Babs tries to life the door and it starts to move upwards. She then proceeds to get her fingers under the bottom, and lifts it up like she was curling a weight barbell...at a 45 degree angle to her! The door creaks, moans, then breaks in multiple places as it's ripped off". The result is the same...get the door 'open'. But her Int 5 didn't let her realize the door needed to be lifted straight up an into the above wall/ceiling, so she did it the most common way she knows...like curling a 150lb barbell with both arms.

PS: This only really works if the player is actually mature enough to do the whole "role-playing" part of the game. In other words...role-play a 5 Int for the sake of it...not "be annoyingly stupid in an attempt to inadvertently kill other PC's or piss-off other players/the DM". Roleplaying is important...everyone should roleplay their characters, but everyone can also use their own brains to enjoy the other tiers of the game as well.

^_^

Paul L. Ming
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Nope, you answered my questions, and I have commented with my thoughts on your answers. If you don't have some replying comment you wish to make regarding my comments, then we have arrived at an understand of each others' positions and how our own positions differ (theoretically at least).

Cool. Thanks for the discussion!
 


Your anecdotal experience doesn't establish an objective norm so far as I know. But I'm glad to see you backtrack on your stated position that there is a right or wrong way to roleplay according to the rules. That's progress and as a result I don't believe we have any further conflict.

The odds that with the sheer number of people I've gamed with over the decades, while it's theoretically possible that it isn't the norm, the reality is that the chances of it not being the norm are next to nil. Have fun playing your way, but I'm exceedingly confident that your way is not the norm.
 

Does anybody expect the following behavior?

5 CON:
"Sorry guys, I can't climb up the stairs of this tower without a Short Rest."

Yes.

5 DEX:
"I trip going back down the stairs. How much damage do I take?"

I would force only that PC to make a dex check if going up or down the stairs quickly. Slowly, no problem.

5 CHA:
"I spit on the NPC. Again." (I'm struggling to come up with examples for this one.)

I fully expect players to roleplay a low charisma and not RP as if they have an average or higher one.

5 WIS:
"Oh, that Lich seems friendly! I offer him a biscuit!" (Honestly it's tough to distinguish between low WIS and low INT for something like this)
I expect foolish decisions from the PC that has a 5 wisdom. Not every decision of course, but a good number of them.

5 STR:
"I can't pull myself onto my horse. You guys need to stay and help me face the oncoming Horde, or leave me here to die."

I would have a PC make a strength check to get up on that horse quick;y to avoid a horde. If he has all the time in the world to try, he wouldn't have to make that check.
 

The odds that with the sheer number of people I've gamed with over the decades, while it's theoretically possible that it isn't the norm, the reality is that the chances of it not being the norm are next to nil. Have fun playing your way, but I'm exceedingly confident that your way is not the norm.
Except that the sheer number of people I've gamed with over the decades include none that share what you consider the "norm" runs counter to the idea that it is actually the norm, and not just the result of you introducing the idea to those you played with.
 

Except that the sheer number of people I've gamed with over the decades include none that share what you consider the "norm" runs counter to the idea that it is actually the norm, and not just the result of you introducing the idea to those you played with.

Since It's pretty much impossible to game with a significant number of people and encounter none who think that a PC with 5 int is stupid and should be roleplayed that way, I'm fairly confident that this is a lie.

Mod Note: Ladies and gents, calling people liars is well into the "uncool," territory. Please don't engage in this head-butting stuff, please. ~Umbran
 
Last edited by a moderator:


pemerton said:
Personally I think this conjecture is positing that the stat generation system has a degree of world-building robustness that I don't think was ever intended.
It's not conjecture. It's based off of articles and official rules stating in multiple editions that IQ = int x 10.
You have misread my post. The phrase this conjuecture refers to your view of INT as a measure of an intelligence property, which it is more common to have a lot of in the gameworld than it is in the real world.

But on the other thing - that IQ = INT*10 - the article by Brian Blume predates AD&D and so is (by your criteria) irrelevant. What are the other articles and official rulings? There are none that I know of for 4e or 5e. Is this another 2nd ed AD&D thing?
 

Correct.



It's not conjecture. It's based off of articles and official rules stating in multiple editions that IQ = int x 10.

I'm sure you wouldn't mind providing citations for these articles and official rules stating that a character's Intelligence gives it the equivalent cognitive ability to an IQ score that equals ten times that Intelligence, if that's what you've been meaning to say, other than the one 3.5 FAQ that's already been discussed that is.
 

Remove ads

Top